Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

John Edwards nails it about the PHONY spat with Dean

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
Cocoa Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-07-05 06:34 PM
Original message
John Edwards nails it about the PHONY spat with Dean
come on people, this Dean thing is stupid.

http://blog.oneamericacommittee.com/article.pl?sid=05/06/06/2117240§ion=&mode=nested&tid=1

What a flap has arisen over a disagreement about the way something is said! I was in Nashville over the weekend, thanking the good people of Tennessee who supported the Democratic presidential ticket this year, when I was asked whether I thought that it was fair to say that people who were Republican hadn’t done a good day’s work. Of course, I didn’t think so, and I said that. I don’t think our DNC chair, Howard Dean, would put it that way again if asked either. I disagreed with him, and I said so. And, I want to be clear, I would have to say so again if I were asked again. I said a lot of good things about Howard’s outreach program and invigoration of the internet as a communication and fundraising tool, but no one wrote about that. Instead the headlines blared that I disagreed with Howard. And then the flap arose: A chasm! A split! A revolt!

Instead, how about: Nonsense!
We are both talking about the Republicans and their failure to address the needs of working people. We both agree with this basic truth: This Republican president and this Republican majority are not doing what they should be doing for working people in this country. That’s a core belief we need to fight for. And what’s more, we agree that we - all Democrats and all working people - should be complaining, criticizing, and generally speaking out about this critical failure of the Republican party and offering our positive vision for America. And we have.

Howard and I have been saying the same thing about this for years. Hear that? The same thing. For years. Have I ever put it some way that Howard wouldn't agree with? Probably. And he put it in a way, once, just the other day, that I can’t agree with, since I come from a place where hard-working people, who are better served by the agenda and passion of the Democrats, somehow still vote Republican. But Howard and I are committed to a 50-state strategy that will reach out to those voters, in North Carolina, and in Kansas, and in Tennessee, across this country and tell the truth about what is happening in this country to their jobs, to their health care, to their forests and streams, to their vision of what this country is and should be.

<snip>

The safety net is eroding. The ladder has been pulled up. This is not new. For more than two decades, the Republican Party has talked about an agenda that addresses concerns of working people while they have passed an agenda that serves the goals of the wealthiest among us. Howard and I know that these are the wrong choices for America. We won’t always use the same words. But we will always fight the same fight: for the dignity, the respect, and the rights of those who built this country, the working people in America.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
xultar Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-07-05 06:37 PM
Response to Original message
1. Shhhh don't ruin the fun. People here wanna think they are fighting
so they can fight one another here. Or the Freepers can come out of hiding and bait us right here on our home turf.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lucky Luciano Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-07-05 06:37 PM
Response to Original message
2. best interests
"And he put it in a way, once, just the other day, that I can’t agree with, since I come from a place where hard-working people, who are better served by the agenda and passion of the Democrats, somehow still vote Republican."

We really do need to figure out how to get people to vote in their best interests...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Rex Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-07-05 06:38 PM
Response to Original message
3. How hard is it, John, just to say "no comment"or
"I refuse to be ambushed by RW talking points." A simple loaded question deflection? Someone please get Mr. Edwards up to speed.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jayctravis Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-07-05 06:43 PM
Response to Reply #3
7. "no comment" is essentially what we have from their side
and I'd rather politicians speak their mind and check each other once in a while. Sharpens their teeth for when they go in for the real debate.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cocoa Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-07-05 06:48 PM
Response to Reply #7
9. yep, let them have their own styles
Edwards and Dean basically agree, but it's not Edwards's style to talk like Dean does.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FreedomAngel82 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-07-05 07:13 PM
Response to Reply #7
11. Yes
And in this case Edwards really told those people off who made a big deal about it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
proud2BlibKansan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-07-05 06:46 PM
Response to Reply #3
8. I think he did okay
No need to refuse to comment. That would have gotten the Dems even more bad publicity.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
blm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-07-05 06:41 PM
Response to Original message
4. The media is blowing this out of proportion to distract from GOPs problems
from the presidency to their problems in congress, to GOP controlled statehouses around the country. The GOP and many corporations are being run by CROOKS and their accounting books PROVE it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WI_DEM Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-07-05 06:41 PM
Response to Original message
5. Edwards is ok
I still like him.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pacalo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-07-05 06:42 PM
Response to Original message
6. Somehow, I already knew that Edwards' comments "against Dean"
were taken out of context. But I appreciate that he addressed it for those who didn't have sense enough to see through the media spin.

Thanks, John!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FreedomAngel82 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-07-05 07:17 PM
Response to Reply #6
12. Of course it was
Who do you think is pulling the strings of the game? Doy.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
meppie-meppie not Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-08-05 09:27 AM
Response to Reply #12
27. yes there is indeed a Rovian whiff in the air but given that 40 some %
of American's still believe Iraq had something to do with 9/11 I think Edwards clarification and calling the media out on their selective editing was important and necessary!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bouncy Ball Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-07-05 06:51 PM
Response to Original message
10. I first heard about this on the TV in the airport, which was tuned to
CNN and the FIRST thing I thought was "I bet $100 it was taken out of context or blown up out of proportion."

Yep, I was right.

The powers that be will do ANYTHING to divide the Democrats, and I do mean anything.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Pacifist Patriot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-07-05 07:21 PM
Response to Reply #10
13. It's typical crap is what it is.
Put three Democrats in one room and three Republicans in the other and you're going to get the exact same amount of agreement and disagreement in both rooms. But for some reason Democratic disagreements are newsworthy and signs of instability while Republican disagreements aren't a blip on the media radar screen. Gee, wonder why.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bouncy Ball Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-07-05 07:24 PM
Response to Reply #13
17. Hmm, let me think......
YEP. Totally agreed. And it's BULLSHIT. This stuff is NOT news-worthy. The MSM is just showing their true colors more and more.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Pacifist Patriot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-07-05 07:22 PM
Response to Original message
14. So how much CNN/MSNBC/FNC/NBC et. al. airtime is this
statement getting compared to the initial crappy reporting?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Guaranteed Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-07-05 07:24 PM
Response to Reply #14
16. That's my question. I also wonder how Edwards would prefer it. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cocoa Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-07-05 07:43 PM
Response to Reply #14
18. I saw it on C-span
the guy from "Hotline" mentioned it, and made a good point about blogs, he said that if something like this is spun by the media, someone like Edwards can bypass the media and get his own spin out.

Unfortunately, the media spun version seems to be the preferred one on DU. :-(
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AmericanDream Donating Member (714 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-07-05 07:54 PM
Response to Reply #18
19. I heard they read it on CNN too....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cthrumatrix Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-07-05 09:08 PM
Response to Reply #14
22. LOL...try none.....the media is not interested in truth
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Eloriel Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-07-05 07:22 PM
Response to Original message
15. Ya know, after I read this here YESTERDAY,
I ended up seeing an actual clip of his remark, and I have to say I wasn't all that impressed with his "explanation" after seeing the clip. It was a very measured, carefully worded, look-into-the-camera (which may have been accidental), slowly stated REBUKE of Dean.

I didn't like it one bit. I was more than willing to give him the benefit of the doubt, but the clip itself isn't his best evidence for all his good will.

Let me put it this way: had he wanted to, there were plenty of less damaging* ways to answer that question. He took the very direct REBUKE option.



* less damaging to him (had he but understood that), Dean, the Democratic Party
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Pepperbelly Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-07-05 08:02 PM
Response to Reply #15
20. is Dr. Dean beyond rebuke?
I'm on Dean's side but hell, no one is beyond rebuke. For sure that is true around here.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
saracat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-08-05 04:36 AM
Response to Reply #20
25. Thank You. Obviously some think he is.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
smartvoter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-07-05 09:18 PM
Response to Reply #15
24. I'm with you Eloriel. Further, he said he'd say it again, which is lost
Edited on Tue Jun-07-05 09:21 PM by smartvoter
in all the gushing out here. He said he stands by his comment, not that he shouldn't have pulled the rug out from under Dean, but it doesn't matter because they're both fighting a common enemy. Reading that blog and then watching the response out here was truly amazing. I had to read it several times because I thought I must have missed something after everyone was falling all over themselves...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
boohootwo Donating Member (95 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-07-05 08:03 PM
Response to Original message
21. Perfect. Use the internet to tell it like it is. Good job Edwards!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ultraist Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-07-05 09:11 PM
Response to Original message
23. Kos posted about this too!
http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=view_all&address=104x3805903

It was also on Inside Politics. They showed a shot of the OAC blog.

The MSM is reading our blogs, no question about it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ngGale Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-08-05 05:22 AM
Response to Reply #23
26. MSM is reading our blogs, have you noticed...
they sure don't talk about the "Downing Street" minutes. It's not like we don't say it enough.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tippy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-08-05 09:39 AM
Response to Original message
28. " Looks a bit different in its proper context "
So who is to blame for cherry picking words? The Media of course..Instead of jumping on Edwards and others, like several here do we should work to get the truth out there quick...and not wait to see if the story is corrected in the media...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue Jan 14th 2025, 12:37 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC