"U.S. Woos North Korea Back to Nuke Talks" -- Hahaha being SENSITIVE

[Bluebear]

WASHINGTON - In a diplomatic breakthrough, the Bush administration said Tuesday it had wooed North Korea back to negotiations on the Koreans' nuclear weapons program, though a date had not been set for reopening the long-stalled talks.

http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20050607/ap_on_go_pr_wh/us_north_korea_19;_ylt=AtGhdSvCI3stVJNIcwAVL6iCscEA;_ylu=X3oDMTBiMW04NW9mBHNlYwMlJVRPUCUl

====



August 12, 2004:

DAYTON, Ohio (CNN) -- Drawing derisive chuckles from the crowd, Vice President Dick Cheney Thursday blasted Sen. John Kerry for a remark the Democratic presidential candidate made last week about fighting a "more sensitive war on terror" if elected.

August 14, 2004:

Senator Kerry has also said that if he were in charge he would fight a "more sensitive" war on terror. (Laughter.) America has been in too many wars for any of our wishes, but not a one of them was ever won by being "sensitive." (Applause.) President Abraham Lincoln and General Grant did not wage sensitive wars. President Roosevelt and Generals Eisenhower and MacArthur did not wage a sensitive war. A "sensitive war" will not destroy the evil men who killed 3,000 Americans on the morning of 9/11, and who now seek chemical, nuclear and biological weapons to kill hundreds of thousands more. The men who beheaded Daniel Pearl and Paul Johnson will not be impressed by our sensitivity. (Applause.) As our opponents see it, the problem isn't the thugs and the murderers we face, but it is somehow our attitude. Well, the American people know better. They know that we are in a fight to preserve our freedom and our way of life, and that we are on the side of right and justice in this battle. Those who threaten us and kill innocents around the world do not need to be treated more sensitively. They need to be destroyed. (Applause.)

[Deja Q]

1. Those who kill innocents and threaten us?

Only if don't we threaten them first.

I'm still a skeptic about Afghanistan and Iraq.