|
Edited on Tue Jun-07-05 10:08 PM by Bozita
This could be interesting. Here's their email:
The World is Watching
June 7, 2005
From the Zapruder film that recorded the assassination of President Kennedy in 1963 to the Rodney King tape broadcast around the world in 1991, video evidence has certainly played a role in shaping contemporary American history. Videotapes played a particularly interesting role during the demonstrations that took place at last summer's Republican National Convention.
The city of New York installed surveillance cameras at locations surrounding the convention, cameras were attached to a blimp floating over the city and many individuals brought their own cameras to document the events. After nearly 2,000 demonstrators were arrested during the convention, these videos would prove to be vital documentation of confrontations between police and demonstrators -- particularly for the hundreds of people against whom charges were dropped because of such video evidence. Perhaps even more charges will be dropped as videotapes surface. So far since the convention, fewer than 200 of those arrested have pleaded guilty or been convicted.
Video surveillance is not limited to major events like political conventions. Just last month, the NYPD announced that it would like to install as many as 400 surveillance cameras across the city. Other major cities have launched similar initiatives.
So how do civil libertarians feel about this? Surely, they must be pleased that video evidence has exonerated demonstrators who were exercising their First Amendment rights. However, they have expressed strong reservations about the increasing prevalence of surveillance cameras. How will their use be regulated to prevent abuse? Don't citizens have a right to go to public places knowing their actions are not going to be recorded? The police say that cameras are effective as deterrents and investigative tools. Indeed, surveillance cameras have provided necessary evidence in arresting many criminals and the NYPD says that crime has dropped in areas where cameras have already been installed.
Tonight, correspondent Dave Marash examines the role of video cameras at the convention and correspondent John Berman takes a look at the relationship between the police and demonstrators. Finally, Ted Koppel will discuss the implications of the witness that doesn't blink with ACLU President Nadine Strossen.
We hope you'll join us.
Hillary Profita & the "Nightline" staff ABC News Washington Bureau
|