Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

How would this country be different if JFK, RK, and MLK had not been

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
chelsea0011 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-09-05 10:31 AM
Original message
How would this country be different if JFK, RK, and MLK had not been
assassinated? Would MLK had gone into politics? If JFK had won a second term would Vietnam and civil rights be different? I think Bobby Kennedy would have affected more progressive change. I think about this as we have forced to think back to Nixon, Vietnam, and the takeover by the far right. I just can't see Nixon ever being elected and don't think Reagan would have happened with Jimmy Carter to kick around. Anyone zoned in enough with these three to figure out what we would be thinking about now?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
CBHagman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-09-05 10:41 AM
Response to Original message
1. I suspect Cambodia would have never been invaded.
We would know Watergate only as a building.

There would possibly be no right-wing media behemoth, at least in its current form.

I'm not certain race relations would have progressed smoothly in general, but we certainly might have missed out on the rioting and destruction and similar.


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SteppingRazor Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-09-05 10:44 AM
Response to Original message
2. It's a HUGELY hypothetical question...
predicting the future is all but impossible. To play devil's advocate, would MLK lose the mainstream relevance he enjoyed during the civil rights movement, to find himself preaching primarily to the left, the way Sharpton and Jesse Jackson do?

Would JFK get caught up in a Clintonian "scandal," thus facilitating Nixon's rise to power in any case?

And would RFK had gone as far without the sympathy afforded him by the tragic loss of his brother?

But personally, I'd like to believe we would have remained in an advisory capacity in Vietnam until finally pulling out to avoid bloodloss (no Johnson, no Gulf of Tonkin). I highly doubt MLK would've gone into elected politics, but he'd still be a force to this day, I think.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EVDebs Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-09-05 10:48 AM
Response to Reply #2
3. It could have been even worse. Operation Northwoods bears that out.
"Nothing new under the sun..."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Dec 27th 2024, 04:44 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC