Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

"The UN is too corrupt..."

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
Solar Donating Member (261 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-09-05 04:06 PM
Original message
"The UN is too corrupt..."
Edited on Thu Jun-09-05 04:06 PM by Solar
I hear this argument every time neocons try to defend Bush's cowboy war in Iraq. They moan on about 'corruption' in the UN and how that supposedly gives us license to do whatever the hell we want because we can't trust anyone else to help us. In fact I heard this argument just two nights ago in a class.

My reply: ... But there is no corruption in Congress or the Presidency?

Tom Delay alone probably has more scandals than than the entire UN! I don't believe that the UN is completely pure and 100% innocent, but in comparison, the UN makes the White House look black with guilt.

The moment some neocon tries to spout garbage about France, Germany or Russia getting secret kickbacks from Saddam for Oil-For-Food, just reply "so the fact that Haliburton is now getting the money under the table makes it all better?"

Don't let the neocons try to sidetrack you with a wild goose chase and pointless diversions, take the debate into your hands and argue the facts. For far too long we Democrats have let the neocons control the discussion. Its time to counter the attack and put them on the defensive.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
EFerrari Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-09-05 04:07 PM
Response to Original message
1. The U.N is only as good as its leadership in the Security Council
Oops.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
emcguffie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-09-05 04:16 PM
Response to Original message
2. People confuse the UN --
and its Secretariat, which is headed by the SG. The CEO, so to speak, of the UN is indeed the Member States. The SG cannot make the Security Council do anything, nor can the SG decide what the UN should/will do.

And back when the Oil for Food corruption was going on, it was not much of a secret. In fact, it was well known at the UN, particularly by all the journalists accredited there at that time as well, and it was the Security Council that declined to do anything about it.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kota Donating Member (658 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-09-05 04:18 PM
Response to Original message
3. If thats the case, Bolton will fit right in.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Meeker Morgan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-09-05 04:49 PM
Response to Reply #3
6. I never went for the big anti-Bolton thing.
No I don't like him. But I don't like any Bush appointee.

The UN ambassador was never considered particularly important before. It's pretty much a ceremonial position.

Yeah he's a stinker.

Hey mister Bolton! Bag that weird cookie duster.

As for the rhetoric that Bolton will destroy the UN, if that is Bush's intent (I don't think it is), it doesn't matter who the ambassador is.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
damntexdem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-09-05 04:42 PM
Response to Original message
4. Compared to the Bushistas, the UN ...
is as pure as the driven snow.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
noamnety Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-09-05 04:44 PM
Response to Original message
5. It's part of our checks and balances
If they are corrupt, we should be able to investigate and call them out on it. Likewise, if the US administration is corrupt, the UN functions as a check on their actions. Thus it's no surprise the neocons oppose the UN.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kellanved Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-09-05 05:40 PM
Response to Original message
7. for the record:
I have yet to see a source mentioning Germany in the kickback deals. It is a pretty good indicator for the agenda of the author.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Dec 27th 2024, 04:28 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC