Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

self-propelling X-band Radar floats on Gulf - hopes to avoid Hurricanes

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
donsu Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-11-05 01:39 PM
Original message
self-propelling X-band Radar floats on Gulf - hopes to avoid Hurricanes

http://www.armscontrolwonk.com/index.php?id=640


Everythin's Bigger in Texas: Sea-based X-band Radar

San Antonio Express-News staff writer Jeorge Zarazua got a chance to climb around the Missile Defense Agency’s gigantic Sea-based X-band Radar (SBX)—a missile defense radar mounted on a self-propelled oil-drilling rig.

The SBX is larger than a football field, which means its journey from Texas to Hawaii (and points beyond) will not include a trip through the Panama Canal. Officials, Zarazua report, had hoped to put the SBX out to sea before June 1 to beat the hurricane season. This could be exciting.

The SBX is also one of the few missile defense activities undertaken by the Bush Administration that required relief from the ABM Treaty. X-band radars are supposed to help discriminate warheads from any accompanying decoys or debris.

-snip-

Both the decision to build SBX instead of a more capable ground-based radar in Alaska and recent test failures stem from a series of deliberate choices by the Bush Administration to meet the arbitrary 2004 election, er, end of year, deadline set by the President. In other words, the President traded the ability to defeat Kim Jong-Il for the ability to defeat John Kerry.
-snip-
-----------------------------------


read on to see what the X-band is supposed to do. as the gen. says: it's a test

"General Obering called the completion of the SBX a “major milestone” for testing that “also gives us an operational capability from a North Korean threat.”


so it can't go thru the Panama Canal. does that mean it will go around the tip of South America? Laughing wildly at the thought.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
hootinholler Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-11-05 03:40 PM
Response to Original message
1. when you're in the Gulf and going to Hawaii...
And you can't use the ditch, then you go around either cape fear or the cape of good hope.

Should be no worse than the North Atlantic or North Pacific in winter.

Begs the question: We couldn't build this in Ca. or Or. or Wa.??? I guess only Tx. has the ability to build an oil rig.

Bwahahaha!

-Hoot
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Dec 27th 2024, 05:17 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC