Clark/Dean or Dean/Clark.... doesn't matter to me

[ShaneGR]

That's my new pick. Now, I must say that if Clark wins the nomination he has ZERO choice about who to pick for VP. Here's why:

$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$

If Clark was to pull out the nomination he'll only have a mere fraction of what Dean has in terms of campaign cash.

Plus, I just think a Clark/Dean or Dean/Clark website would look really cool. They could get rid of the Dean bat and put a tank in.

lol.

[_NorCal_D_]

1. Dosen't matter to me either.

It would be quite a potent duo.

[knight_of_the_star]

2. Rove's worst nightmare

A man on the top of the ticket who is a southerner with 34 years of military experience and a man as VP who is an MD with a good record as a governor, both of whom are charismatic, intelligent, and (based on what I've heard from the ladies here and elsewhere) good-looking. Against an idiot who ducked out of military service with a face like a chimp that got a shave and a creepy old oil executive that should be in a casket he's so cadaverous. Don't have to think much to figure out the outcome there.

[Speck Tater]

3. The real danger is ...

... that Clark will self-destruct and nobody will want him as a running mate. Watch out for his ego to work as cross-purposes with his Clintonista puppet masters.

[bfusco]

4. Doesn't matter to me either

Who ever has the best shot of beating the chimp and that combination is the most appealing to me. I agree they would round one another out well. Dean has domestic ideas, has run an executive office, has a strong and well funded originization. Clark brings national security/foreign policy credentials that Dean lacks and indpendent and moderate appeal. Being from Arkansas, he could be instrumental in pulling in some "red states".