Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

The jurors did a great job. What a waste of government time and expense.

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
genius Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-13-05 04:22 PM
Original message
The jurors did a great job. What a waste of government time and expense.
Edited on Mon Jun-13-05 04:25 PM by genius
Perhaps, it's time the government started going after real criminals -like Bush.

And I guess the fans won't be burning down the jurors' houses.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Atman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-13-05 04:36 PM
Response to Original message
1. I'm sorry, by child molesters are "real criminals"
Jesus.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Walt Starr Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-13-05 04:37 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. Yup, they sure are
and prosecutors need to prove their cases beyond a reasonable doubt. Reasonable doubt has become perhaps the single highest priced commodity in the United States today
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
genius Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-13-05 04:41 PM
Response to Reply #1
4. Didn't you hear the jury? He's not guilty. He's the victim of a vendetta
The prosecution and the pro-prosecution judge did their best to convict an innocent man but they lost. It was the kids that won because Michael's music is doing a lot more to help kids. The lies and false accustions only attack the faith of the younger generation in their heroes. This was s good day for the good guys.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Atman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-13-05 05:01 PM
Response to Reply #4
6. I didn't hear the jury say "he was a victim of a vendetta."
Edited on Mon Jun-13-05 05:07 PM by Atman
Did I miss something? Or perhaps you're a huge Michael Jackson fan.

I'm happy for you, I suppose, though I am not sure what for. Jackson has a demonstrable history. Being gleeful that the prosecution was sloppy does nothing to stop a child molester from molesting again. You can cry "acquittal" all you want, but that only pertains to THIS sloppy case. It is his history, the stuff that he actually admits to, the previous conduct, that you need to worry about. All serial killers get away with killing...until they don't.

So, great, there was a sloppy prosecution.

Tell that to the parents of the next kid Jackson liquors up and lures to his bed. I'm sure they'll understand.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rustydog Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-13-05 04:39 PM
Response to Original message
3. It is not a waste, this is how the criminal justice system works
You are tried by a jury of your peers (if you so choose) and you let the Govt prove it's case.
the govt couldn't prove its case beyond a REASONABLE doubt, the jury had to acquit.

Not a waste at all. This proves the system works.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
genius Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-13-05 04:43 PM
Response to Reply #3
5. It is a waste when he was only tried because of a vendetta.
The prosecution didn't have a case and they needed to bring in all kinds of ridiculous stuff to try to confuse the jury. It didn't work.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Atman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-13-05 05:04 PM
Response to Reply #5
7. There's that word again.
Vendetta.

I heard every word of the jury verdict, and I still can't find the word vendetta........
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ISUGRADIA Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-13-05 10:42 PM
Response to Reply #7
8. Rolling Stone had a great article about the shortcomings of the
Edited on Mon Jun-13-05 10:43 PM by ISUGRADIA
procecutor's case and his zeal.

A key sentence to me, "You can dismiss Sneddon as a monomaniacal, headline-hungry bureaucrat and his witnesses as scheming, lying-ass gold diggers, but there's no avoiding the fact that Michael Jackson is, undeniably, one seriously weird motherfucker."

http://www.rollingstone.com/news/story/_/id/7203631/michaeljackson?pageid=rs.Home&pageregion=single2&rnd=1118720383877&has-player=true&version=6.0.12.1040
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Dec 27th 2024, 04:16 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC