Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

I'm Pleased And Relieved By The Jackson Not Guility Verdict

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
Itsthetruth Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-13-05 04:34 PM
Original message
I'm Pleased And Relieved By The Jackson Not Guility Verdict
I'm pleased with the verdict. This will drive the right-wingnuts .... NUTS!

Jackson is certainly a strange bird with bizarre behavior. But, that does not make him a pedophile. He liked pornography featuring adult heterosexual males/females, not child pornography, and I suspect such pornography would not interest an adult male pedophile interested in the same sex. Just a feeling. I don't know if that's a fact.

Michael Jackson, on the advice of friends and attorneys, will certainly end any more activity that could open him up to future victimization by people hoping to strike it rich.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Kraklen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-13-05 04:35 PM
Response to Original message
1. Me too.
And it restores my faith in the justice system.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
proud2BlibKansan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-13-05 04:36 PM
Response to Reply #1
3. Me three
After they mangled the OJ case out there in CA, it was a relief to see them get this one right.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TahitiNut Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-13-05 04:38 PM
Response to Reply #3
5. Me four.
Edited on Mon Jun-13-05 04:39 PM by TahitiNut
I also regarded the OJ criminal verdict as just.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ConfuZed Donating Member (856 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-13-05 04:44 PM
Response to Reply #5
18. Me Five
All of these racists can kiss my round black butt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kraklen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-13-05 04:38 PM
Response to Reply #3
8. Oh, I agree with the OJ verdict.
I think it's just like this. They get the right verdict, everybody who doesn't really know anything about the case goes nuts because they had already made up their own mind.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Itsthetruth Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-13-05 04:43 PM
Response to Reply #8
17. I Didn't Agree With The O.J. Verdict
I didn't agree with the O.J. verdict, however, the prosecution just botched that case and the jurors couldn't find him guilty. In this case, the prosecution just didn't have any evidence to back up their claims!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kraklen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-13-05 04:47 PM
Response to Reply #17
25. I should clarify.
Whether or not OJ did it, I did agree with the jury in that the defense raised reasonable doubt during the trial.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
proud2BlibKansan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-13-05 04:59 PM
Response to Reply #8
30. I agreed with the OJ verdict
but still believe he killed his wife. It just wasn't proven in court.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
goclark Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-13-05 07:16 PM
Response to Reply #1
33. It restores my faith as well

I'll admit that I believed that he could not possibly get a fair trial in Santa Maria.

He did.

They did not convict him because he was African American.

He was deemed not guilty because of the evidence in the case.

He was represented by a white attorney, not a Johnnie Cochran.

He was still deemed not guilty!

He was branded totally by the media as being crazy, odd, weird and yet a jury of citizens carefully decided that he was not guilty.

God Bless America!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Nite Owl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-13-05 04:36 PM
Response to Original message
2. If he was guilty of
anything it was being weird.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KittyWampus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-13-05 04:40 PM
Response to Reply #2
12. And Using Children For His Own Personal Psychodrama. That Is Abusive
Edited on Mon Jun-13-05 04:41 PM by cryingshame
so what he had a rough childhood. It's still abuse to use kids the way he has.

Of course it's not sexual abuse... but tis abuse.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Itsthetruth Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-13-05 04:46 PM
Response to Reply #12
23. He Wasn't Charge With That
eom
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KittyWampus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-13-05 04:50 PM
Response to Reply #23
28. Right You Are. No Argument From Me.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bagimin Donating Member (945 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-13-05 04:42 PM
Response to Reply #2
15. I'm gonna get me some boys for tonight!
it's legal.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cynatnite Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-13-05 04:37 PM
Response to Original message
4. 'Activist Jurors' could become their new phrase n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Walt Starr Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-13-05 04:38 PM
Response to Original message
6. I dunno if he's guilty or not, but the standard is beyond a reasonable
doubt.

The prosecutors obviously did not even come close to that standard in their case.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ishoutandscream2 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-13-05 04:38 PM
Response to Original message
7. Yes, no "Jacko in jail" stories. Maybe the MSM will cover real news
like, for instance, the continuing quagmire in Iraq, or the DSM.

Okay, okay, I'm sorry. Stop laughing!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
donheld Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-13-05 04:40 PM
Response to Original message
9. I join you in your feelings
Much love to Michael.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hokie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-13-05 04:40 PM
Response to Original message
10. My thoughts also
I had absolutely no opinion about this case until today when I heard that the verdict was in. I do not know why but I thought to myself "What verdict would Fox news love to see?" Obviously the answer was guilty. They want to see anyone who is black or from Hollywood go down. After that I knew what I wanted the verdict to be.

i think the prosecution should have never brought this case in the first place. I sounds like every accuser was tainted in some way or the other.

Anyway it is over. Let's get on with the DSM scandal!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
crispini Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-13-05 04:46 PM
Response to Reply #10
24. You know, you're quite right about Faux news.
Never thought about it -- you KNOW they would have eaten a guilty verdict up with a spoon.

I can't opine on the verdict 'cause I wasn't there, but here's hoping justice was served.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Chipper Chat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-13-05 04:40 PM
Response to Original message
11. I hope this verdict is a metaphor
for the disgust ordinary citizens feel for the right-wing of this country attempting to dictate morality in addition to the ever-increasing political takeover. Maybe the backlash has begun.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bigluckyfeet Donating Member (559 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-13-05 04:43 PM
Response to Reply #11
16.  Eat that you corporate whore media
I love it,the media had already convicted him.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
gratefull4u Donating Member (169 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-13-05 04:41 PM
Response to Original message
13. I agree also!
If one could go to prison for being weird I'd be in jail! Thank God 12 people were able to see that Michael is just different.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
malaise Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-13-05 04:42 PM
Response to Original message
14. Add me to that list
time to deal with the Memo now...they are guilty.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kahuna Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-13-05 04:45 PM
Response to Original message
19. Me too. I couldn/'t watch the verdict on TV. I just learned about
it from DU. My take is that after the airing of that interview, the boy's mother had people in her ear telling her, "girl you could sue Michael Jackson and get muy rico." The prosecutor was out to get him and immediately had children services investigate to see if there was anything fishy. That investigation turned up empty. But they couldn't let it rest. Had to get him anyway.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FrenchieCat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-13-05 04:45 PM
Response to Original message
20. Michael Jackson who?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Fridays Child Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-13-05 04:45 PM
Response to Original message
21. I didn't follow his exploits or this trial closely enough to have...
...an opinion about his guilt or innocence. But I do know that it is a common ploy of pedophiles to show heterosexual pornography to their victims, in the hope that they will become sexually aroused.

I don't even know if he showed it to any boys. I'm just saying that the presence of heterosexual pornography in his home is not exculpatory, in and of itself.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
PinkTiger Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-13-05 04:46 PM
Response to Original message
22. I am also pleased.
I hope Michael J dismantles Neverland and keeps himself away from dangerous lunatics from hereon out.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Itsthetruth Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-13-05 04:49 PM
Response to Reply #22
26. Rev. Jesse Jackson Comment
He just said that the mass media convicted Michael Jackson with their slanted coverage.

And Reverand Sharpton just said that this trial vindicated Jackson and that "this is good for America" because a person must be considered innocent until proven guilty.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
genius Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-13-05 04:53 PM
Response to Reply #26
29. Good for them.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Melodybe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-13-05 04:50 PM
Response to Original message
27. That is the stupidest thing that you could think in this case
but by all means go ahead and shoot us in the foot.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Medium Baby Jesus Donating Member (592 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-13-05 05:01 PM
Response to Reply #27
31. You worry about your foot
and I'll worry about mine

feh
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Itsthetruth Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-13-05 05:02 PM
Response to Reply #27
32. What's Stupid?
Pleased that Jackson was found not guilty by a jury and that right-wing media and organizations won't be cheering a guilty verdict?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Goldmund Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-13-05 07:17 PM
Response to Original message
34. Me thirty-three.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Itsthetruth Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-14-05 11:23 AM
Response to Reply #34
35. kick
eom
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Dec 27th 2024, 04:08 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC