|
I am registered as an Independent. Prior to the 2000 election, I considered myself a Moderate, with Liberal leanings. To me, that translated as someone who respected fiscal discipline, but at the same time understood the importance of "big government" -- meat inspectors, firefighters, well equipped and trained military, etc. I have no problem with my tax money helping people get on their feet, but I'm not interested in helping people make welfare a way of life. I'm Pro-Choice, Pro-Police, and Anti-Drug. I like Unions and what they stand for, but I've also got personal knowledge of members who took advantage of them, and didn't pull their weight who I believe were unfairly protected from getting fired; I get both sides of the issue. I have a strong faith which I don't usually go around babbling about, and I don't want to hear about "God" in the science room or "sin" in the sexual education class.
Like I said, a pretty middle of the road, common sense approach to life, until the Right Wing Wackos apparently decided this made me a Liberal Commie Pinko. I did NOT nor have I EVER supported George W. Bush for ANYTHING; the man is pure EVIL as far as I am concerned, and I looked into him enough to know in NOVEMBER OF 2000 that he would take us to war with Iraq. (Yes, I have that in writing.)
But locally, I have voted for both Democrats AND Republicans, and even some Libertarians and other third party people. If I wasn't familiar with the folks running, my vote would usually go the "woman's ticket" route, on the assumption that getting as many women into office was probably the best thing. I voted for Gennifer Granholm (D) for Governor, and Terri Lynn Land (R) for Secretary of State; I'm pleased with the performance of both women. I have always believed CHARACTER counted more than party affiliation, because I really believe both parties have "good people" who want to do the right thing, and I *NEVER* gave either time or money to EITHER party --
Until 2004, when I found myself pulling money out of my pocket and time out of my life to get Kerry elected. Suddenly "Independent Ida" was actively volunteering for the Democrats!
To be honest, I wasn't really impressed with a lot of the folks who were running the show; yes, there were some good people, and everyone seemed to have good intentions, but I swear to God a few times I was actually wondering if they were TRYING to lose the election. It was small stuff mostly, like not having bumper stickers for anyone who wanted one, and charging people $5 for yard signs (that cost a buck!), but there was big stuff too -- like letting the Republicans bray about their patriotism on 9-11, while the Democrats praised each other on how they weren't "politicizing the issue" -- which was frankly a big issue for me -- LIHOP, MIHOP, Whatever! 3,000 dead Americans on this guy's watch, and NO ONE discussed this as a PROBLEM???
So, now I'm asking you folks, and I'm hoping I don't get too many flames for the question: Do I, as a "coveted" Independent voter have more influence on the political process, or should I throw my hands in the air, and sign up with the Democrats? I'm ornery, cantankerous, independent, and not much of a team player -- frankly, it seems like a good fit. Then again, if I make my "party affiliation" Republican, I can always claim to be "super upset and dissatisfied" but wouldn't that be extremely dishonest because I can't stand Bush, and want ALL REPUBLICANS *OUT* of power in Washington ASAP (even though I voted for my local Sheriff who is in the "R" category)?
So, back to the question:
Which "party affiliation" -- Independent, Democrat OR EVEN REPUBLICAN, will help me THE MOST in making my views "heard" by my representatives?
Thanks much! :) Best, Ida
|