Wineke: One Schiavo question still unanswered
Bill WinekeWisconsin State Journal
June 15, 2005
(snip)
So much for the national controversy, which dominated the news for weeks. So much for all the medical experts who went on television assuring us that Schiavo might recover with therapy.
So much for the claims of friends and family that she followed them with her eyes - not likely if she was blind.
So much for the emergency actions of Congress aimed at overturning a federal court decision and so much for President Bush's decision to fly back to Washington in the middle of the night to sign the legislation.
Finally, so much for all the accusations that Schiavo's husband might have strangled her and caused her condition.
(snip)
The question the autopsy doesn't answer and could not answer is this: Did her husband and society have a moral obligation to maintain her existence anyway?
(snip)
The counter-argument is also powerful: Every dollar we spend keeping alive a body that is in a permanently vegetative state (some ethicists prefer the term "permanently unconscious") is a dollar that can't be used for the care of someone else, someone who, presumably, might have a chance at meaningful life.
(snip)
http://www.madison.com/wsj/home/local/index.php?ntid=43756&ntpid=9