Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

5 Marines, 1 sailor: you see this often.. lone sailors among Marine KIA's

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
expatriot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-16-05 11:42 AM
Original message
5 Marines, 1 sailor: you see this often.. lone sailors among Marine KIA's
Edited on Thu Jun-16-05 11:44 AM by expatriot
Are they so desperate for personnel to do convoy duty that they are pulling security personnel out of the regular Navy to help Marines do land duty?


Sad thought in my head, "I know its dangerous mom but I am signing up for the NAVY... who would we ever fight in the next 50 years with a decent Navy... I'll be safe, mom... It's not like I am signing up the MARINES or anything."


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
nadinbrzezinski Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-16-05 11:43 AM
Response to Original message
1. Yes, but also the Marines do not have their owm Medics
so chances are that was the corpman
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Howardx Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-16-05 11:43 AM
Original message
i believe that is correct
its always been the case.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
expatriot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-16-05 11:48 AM
Response to Original message
11. what's the logic behind THAT?
I'm serious. that is interesting.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
davepc Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-16-05 11:55 AM
Response to Reply #11
18. It goes back to the roots of the services
So what started out as necessity of wooden ships and iron men became tradition and today its just prohibitively expensive and unnecessary for the Marines to duplicate the medical services they get from the Navy for their own force structure.


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
htuttle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-16-05 11:43 AM
Response to Original message
2. In a word, yes
Yes they are.

They've been doing this for at least half a year. I think they give the sailors about a week of 'infantry training', hand them a rifle and send them out.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
benburch Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-16-05 11:44 AM
Response to Reply #2
4. So NOT just Medics and SEALs????
WOW.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kittenpants Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-16-05 11:49 AM
Response to Reply #2
12. Jesus, poor guys.
I bet they never imagined this when they signed up.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
oneighty Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-16-05 11:53 AM
Response to Reply #2
16. I doubt that
But when I was in the navy aboard a mine sweeper in Korea I was a member of the "landing party" we had weapons we barely knew how to use. In our case the "landing party" was sent out in the dark of night to identify non responsive radar targets. Sometimes they were Korean fishing boats laying mines.

My Navy buddy had a son in the navy (E-5 Submariner) serving in Kuwait involved in moving supplies into the ME. An odd job for a sailor in his classification.

180
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kraklen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-16-05 12:12 PM
Response to Reply #16
25. Why would you doubt it?
See post #19
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
oneighty Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-16-05 12:23 PM
Response to Reply #25
30. I have no problem
believing in Sailors being conscripted for non-combat duty. My ex-navy buddy had a son in Kuwait doing just that (An E-5 Submariner). I doubt they would stick a weapon in their untrained hands and put them in with battlefield trained Marines. I think the Marines would protest. Perhaps they would have a Sailor ride shotgun in a convoy. I can imagine that.

180
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kraklen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-16-05 12:26 PM
Response to Reply #30
31. defusing bombs under fire is non-combat duty?
Huh.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
oneighty Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-16-05 12:37 PM
Response to Reply #31
32. Now you are in my territory
Since I was Navy Explosive Ordnance Disposal. (Bomb disposal) Why did you bring that up? Yes Navy has a lot of EODs in Iraq. I belong to the Navy Explosive Ordnance Disposal Association. The subject comes up now and then. Of course if one works in the combat zone they are in combat.

I have my combat action ribbon.

180
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kraklen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-16-05 12:39 PM
Response to Reply #32
33. Because it mentions defusing bombs under fire...
in the article linked in post #19 on the conscripting of regular Navy sailors into combat duty.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
oneighty Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-16-05 12:58 PM
Response to Reply #33
35. Navy EODs
Are well trained in explosive ordnance foreign and domestic from cannon balls to nuclear weapons. They are trained in surface ordnance and underwater ordnance. Normal training is about 12 months. There are no shortcuts. EODs know exactly what it is they do. Not like the news article suggests.

And yes it is not unusual for Sailors to be assigned to non sailor duties. As EOD I worked with army navy air force and marines at various times. Incidentally Military EODs of all services attend the same school and in classes together.

For what it is worth.

180
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kraklen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-16-05 12:12 PM
Response to Reply #16
26. Why would you doubt it?
See post #19
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ThomWV Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-16-05 11:43 AM
Response to Original message
3. Seal
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
expatriot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-16-05 11:47 AM
Response to Reply #3
9. oh, duh.... never thought of that but that begs another question....
They're so desperate for convoy personnel they're having highly trained SEALS ride shotgun. I would think that the effectiveness of a single SEAL riding in prominently non-SEAL unit would be greatly diminished but I guess when I talk about modern military strategy I talk out of my ass (as I do on many topics, come to think about it).
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
opihimoimoi Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-16-05 11:44 AM
Response to Original message
5. They even send the wounded back to the death zone....Damn...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
oneighty Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-16-05 11:45 AM
Response to Original message
6. Hospital Corpsman (Medics) are sailors
Navy has always supplied Marines with medical care. Hospital Corpsmen (All military medics) are the bravest of the brave.

180
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Marnieworld Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-16-05 12:05 PM
Response to Reply #6
20. my hubby was a navy medic in the first Gulf war
I'll tell him you said that. He'll like that.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
oneighty Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-16-05 12:10 PM
Response to Reply #20
23. He and all the other Corpsmen
that serve with the Fleet Marines deserve that.

180
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tierra_y_Libertad Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-16-05 11:45 AM
Response to Original message
7. Probably a corpsman. A medic in army jargon.
Now just more wormfood for colonialism.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
davepc Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-16-05 11:47 AM
Response to Original message
8. The Marines do not have organic medical services, battlefield or otherwise
Edited on Thu Jun-16-05 11:47 AM by davepc
they depend on the Navy. Marine 'medics' are all Navy Sailors.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kraklen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-16-05 11:48 AM
Response to Original message
10. There was an article over a year ago...
about how they were so desperate for personnel that they were pulling sailors out of the Navy and sticking them on convoys without proper training.

I'm sure the situation has only gotten worse.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
davepc Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-16-05 11:52 AM
Response to Reply #10
14. Yeah, except they volunteered for the job.
http://www.chinfo.navy.mil/navpalib/cno/n87/usw/issue_21/sandcrab.htm

The gritty, sandy soil of Iraq, far from any ocean, is an unlikely place to find a trio of submarine Sailors.

And yet these three undersea warriors have joined the Coalition Military Assistance Training Team (CMATT) in that war-weary nation in a daunting mission. Trading their duties in the relative comfort of shore stations in the United States for the unexpected perils and occasional rewards of a front-line position in the Global War on Terrorism, the three submariners have exchanged their coveralls for desert camouflage to help rebuild the Iraqi military and its infrastructure. Headquartered in Baghdad, CMATT works under the guidance of the Coalition Provisional Authority to supply buildings, weapons, equipment, and training for Iraq’s new security and defense forces.

ETC(SS) Jason Taggart, YN2(SS) Randy Murray, and YN2(SS) Karl Rosenkranz, who served together onboard USS Henry M. Jackson (SSBN-730), volunteered for this unique assignment. After a week of training and processing at Fort Bliss, Texas, they climbed aboard a plane for Kuwait and then moved on to Baghdad.


emphasis added
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kraklen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-16-05 11:54 AM
Response to Reply #14
17. Not the ones I read about.
In fact, they were quite unhappy about the situation.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
davepc Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-16-05 12:02 PM
Response to Reply #17
19. You're right -- my bad
Edited on Thu Jun-16-05 12:02 PM by davepc
http://www.boston.com/news/world/middleeast/articles/2005/04/26/unready_for_combat/

At least 3,000 Navy and Air Force personnel such as Peters -- trained mainly in noncombat specialties such as mechanics and construction -- are serving on the front lines of the Iraqi insurgency. The Iraq war is the first military engagement in which such large numbers of air and naval personnel are serving in combat roles on the ground, facing imminent threat of attack.

Most of them have received only crash courses in basic combat, in some cases after they've arrived in the Middle East and then been stationed near the front lines because of shortages of troops in the Army and Marine Corps. Though technically defined as support units, their jobs -- guarding convoys and oil facilities, or defusing bombs under fire -- bear little resemblance to traditional ''noncombat" duty in the safety of a base.

''Airmen are driving trucks in Iraq because the Army didn't have enough of them," Brigadier General S. Taco Gilbert, the Air Force's deputy director for strategic planning, said in a recent interview. ''They're manning .50-caliber machine guns."

Some of the service members contend that they have not been provided with sufficient skills to protect themselves in combat situations.


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DemoTex Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-16-05 11:52 AM
Response to Original message
13. There was a naval forward observer at Hamburger Hill in 1969.
He was there to direct the fire of the battleship USS Iowa's 16-inch guns (2000 pound shell).

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
oneighty Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-16-05 12:05 PM
Response to Reply #13
21. Beach Jumper
I think they were called. In Korea there was a single engine plane flying over the target area spotting for the battleship laying way off shore barely visible to the naked eye.

The sixteen inch projectiles from the battleship tumbled through the air high up over our minesweeper.

They go whoooooshhhhh whoooooshhhhhhh. Scary sound.

yipeeeeee

180
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
maxrandb Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-16-05 12:54 PM
Response to Reply #13
34. That's My Old Ship!!!!!
Edited on Thu Jun-16-05 12:55 PM by maxrandb
First ship I was on in the Navy!!

We used to be able to observe the "broadsides" from either the foc'sle (pronounced foxe-ill), or from the O5 level bridge. If you stuck your head out to far over the railing, the fireball would singe your eyebrows. Once the shock-wave (what you see making almost perfect circles in the water) knocked me on my ass and sent me flying about 10 feet.

People used to think that the "broadside" moved the ship sideways in the water, but at 48,000 tons, it would take a lot to move that ship.

You could be in the "shitter" just forward of turret 3 when they shot those guns and the toilet paper rolls would start dispensing toilet paper by themselves.

Simply awesome ship. I've never had, and probably never will have a better tour than the 4 years I spent on the Dreadnought IOWA.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
alcibiades_mystery Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-16-05 11:53 AM
Response to Original message
15. Navy corpsmen: all Marine medics are Navy personnel
Get with it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
GoldenOldie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-16-05 12:16 PM
Response to Reply #15
28. How about the SeeBee's (sp) the Navy Construction?
They have always been in on the groundfloor for constructing runways, etc.

My grandson joined a highschool SeaBee ROTC and was given his "training?" by a SeaBee Reserve Unit the only Naval ROTC available in the area. He stayed with it for 2-years until he realized they had nothing to offer him as he was interested in becoming a Naval Officer on the water and he certainly wasn't interested in construction work.

After reading or hearing the same thing that they were going to reassign Naval personnel into the Army/Marine land battlefield, I told my grandson he should rethink his career moves.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ls317 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-16-05 12:07 PM
Response to Original message
22. Dont Forget
USAF Combat Controllers and Pararescue can work with USMC and Army.They are often assigned to combat areas of operation also.Combat Controllers and Pararescue have medical training.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
liberalitch Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-16-05 12:10 PM
Response to Original message
24. The Navy sends observers too....
I guy who lived across the hall from me was a photographer.... who they sent along with the marines.... he saw some gnarly shit and his negatives have never been declassified.
Fortunately though when his hitch was up... they didn't do a stop loss because his PTSD was so bad that he was allowed to retire.
He and his wife live in the outer banks now
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Zynx Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-16-05 12:15 PM
Response to Original message
27. Marine medics are actually sailors. Arcane, but true.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
GreatCaesarsGhost Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-16-05 12:18 PM
Response to Original message
29. Navy Corpsmen - the Marine Corps few good men.
navy corpsman '69 - '73

and please don't call them medics.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Dec 27th 2024, 04:25 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC