|
I actually think not.
In all the other scandals surrounding idiot son, there has been some evidence, some smoke, some assertions, some bad events .... but to the scandal itself, there's thus far been no actual proof. On any of it.
Circumstantial evidence, assertions, statements from nobodies or statements from muzzled (Sibyl Edmonds) persons, statements from mid level people (Lt Col Karen Kwiatkowski), unfounded statements, etc.
But no irrefutable proof.
The DSM is different. BEFORE there was a story, there was the proof. Meeting Minutes. Leaked from a high level UK Government source. Authenticity has now been confirmed by news organizations NOT aligned to our side.
I really see this one as different.
And in light of that, the tactics of idiot son to counter the DSM and the follow-on documents will, necessarily, be different. I don't know what they'll be, but they *will* be different. And since we're actually out in front on this, and since the story's getting legs, and since many people **in government** are talking about it, and since the cablenewzshowz are putting up their stupid online polls about it, and since it is in newspapers on Main Street, and since people on Main Street are talking about it, and since ...... and since ....., idiot son has to find a counter. But finding a counter when on offense (their usual posture) is far easier than finding one when on defense (which is where they are right now).
No ... this one's different.
But make no mistake .... this is NO slam dunk. Idiot son may be an idiot, but his keepers and handlers are not. They play hard ball. They think like Michael Corleone. We need to think like Vito Corleone.
At least.
My apologies for mangling the spelling of real people's names.
|