Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Did Blair concoct the yellow cake stuff for *? DSM musings

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
lawladyprof Donating Member (628 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-18-05 08:25 AM
Original message
Did Blair concoct the yellow cake stuff for *? DSM musings
As I was watching the forum and people were talking about the discredited British report ("Bush warned not to rely on British intelligence X months before the 18 words" etc.), I got to wondering why the British, who are no slouches at intelligence themselves, would produce such a piece of cr*p. Maybe it was made to order?

Think about it. Bush/Cheney couldn't order our intelligence services to fabricate it (it might come out since it was more than merely massaging intelligence) so they ask the helpful Tony to "cook" something up that they COULD use. Tony doesn't use it himself (it wasn't concocted for him) so no one in the UK investigates its provenance very rigorously. And when it is discredited, Bush/Cheney can say, "Well, it wasn't OURS" and, of course, there's no trail on this side of the pond. Or, "I never said that (that Saddam Hussein was trying to buy uranium from/in Africa). I said the British said that."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
BlueEyedSon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-18-05 08:27 AM
Response to Original message
1. I dunno who ordered it, but i think it came from a shady business man
in Italy.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lawladyprof Donating Member (628 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-18-05 09:06 AM
Response to Reply #1
2. Yes, it did but who was behind it?
It just seemed so very convenient--almost made-to-order. The one who was going to use it (the US) wasn't the one who produced (the UK) and the one who produced it (the UK) wasn't the one who used it (the US).

US people who might be suspicious would really be able to investigate in the UK and UK people who might be able to probe weren't really riled up about it because Blair didn't rely on it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Dec 27th 2024, 04:27 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC