Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Britain: Parliamentary probe exposes lies on Iraqi weapons

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
dave502d Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-18-05 06:50 PM
Original message
Britain: Parliamentary probe exposes lies on Iraqi weapons
The Foreign Affairs Select Committee investigation into whether Prime Minister Tony Blair’s Labour government distorted intelligence material to justify its planned war against Iraq is to publish its verdict on July 8. There is every reason to suppose that the Labour-dominated committee in Parliament will make criticisms of the government that stop short of accusing it of lying—a classic fudge. But some of the testimony given to the inquiry makes this difficult. It stands as a damning indictment of the way the government set out to sell a previously determined decision to go to war by claiming that Iraq possessed weapons of mass destruction. In order that this information does not remain buried amidst thousands of pages of undigested transcripts, the World Socialist Web Site is publishing a précis of the most important testimony given.

http://www.wsws.org/articles/2003/jul2003/wmd1-j03.shtml
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
LightningFlash Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-18-05 06:53 PM
Response to Original message
1. Indict Tony Blair's entire team.
And throw Tony Blair in jail, then lets import him to the USA to give official testimony. :mad:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Stockholm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-19-05 05:08 AM
Response to Reply #1
3. import?
Rendition his ass and send him to Egypt for questioning.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
muriel_volestrangler Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-19-05 05:03 AM
Response to Original message
2. This report was overtaken by events
Gilligan had given evidence to them, but, by the time the report was published, David Kelly's name had not been made public. When it was, they took evidence from him separately (in which he said he didn't think he was Gilligan's primary source, playing down what he had said to Gilligan), but Kelly's suicide a few days later eclipsed it all.

To be honest, the evidence given to the Hutton Inquiry was more damning. See http://www.the-hutton-inquiry.org.uk/ .
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Dec 27th 2024, 03:41 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC