Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

mislead? MISLEAD? he fucking LIED us into a war!

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
mopaul Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-19-05 10:46 AM
Original message
mislead? MISLEAD? he fucking LIED us into a war!
and continues to this day, unabated.

the word 'mislead' just doesn't explain what he did, and it softens the impact of what actually happened.

was america mislead into a war? let's drop the fancy double talk and at least be truthful TO OURSELVES. he lied us into war. he is a war criminal.

i was never mislead, not for a minute. certain war supporters and bush supporters can always say that they too were mislead, but i won't believe them.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
BlueEyedSon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-19-05 10:51 AM
Response to Original message
1. yuppers.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
GreenArrow Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-19-05 10:52 AM
Response to Original message
2. lied?
Edited on Sun Jun-19-05 10:53 AM by GreenArrow
Of course he/they lied. Not even good lies either, but big whopping unmistakable transparent ones, lies told with INTENT to PURPOSEFULLY MISLEAD.

"Misled" implies "Mis"take and there was no mistake about this, they did it on purpose.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KlatooBNikto Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-19-05 11:45 AM
Response to Reply #2
10. If you subject him to the same test on 9/11 he will fail that test too.
That is their greatest fear.Paraphrasing Pogo, "We have met the terrorists and they are us"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tuvor Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-19-05 10:52 AM
Response to Original message
3. Exactly."Misled" means you fell for the lies.
I wasn't misled, and neither were millions of others, because we didn't believe...

...his LIES.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Karenina Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-19-05 01:53 PM
Response to Reply #3
16. No, we did NOT!

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Dez Donating Member (826 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-19-05 11:01 AM
Response to Original message
4. It was obvious to me
and to a lot of other people he was lying .. what's with all the stupid people who believe his bullshit? I mean, come on! People are nothing more than stupid sheep.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bellamia Donating Member (671 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-19-05 11:34 AM
Response to Original message
5. A phrase comes to mind from the field of Psychology.........
"A suspicion of being wrong, in the maladjusted, leads to a conviction that they are right , and they will defend it to its death."

Operative word: MALADJUSTED, as is the Pissadent.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KlatooBNikto Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-19-05 11:36 AM
Response to Original message
6. This is why I found George Galloway so refreshing.He was able to inject
some plainspeaking into our language corrupted by years of sophistry.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
malmapus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-19-05 03:51 PM
Response to Reply #6
23. Heck yeah
We need people like him here.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
leftchick Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-19-05 11:37 AM
Response to Original message
7. It is the NYT's favorite word for chimpy's lies.
Funny how they never hesitated to use the word lie when it comes to BJs.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KlatooBNikto Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-19-05 11:40 AM
Response to Reply #7
8. The NYT has yet to call the War on Vietnam or the War on Iraq an
Aggression. What can you expect from the facilitators of U.S. dominance?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LibDemAlways Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-19-05 11:45 AM
Response to Original message
9. I don't recall the repukes ever saying that
Clinton "mislead" people about Monica. It was always "He lied. He needs to be impeached."

The BFEE lies about the reasons for starting an unnecessary war that kills thousands, if not hundreds of thousands, and all we hear is "We may have been mislead...."

And this comes from Dems as well as repukes and media whores. Why the reluctance to call a lie, a lie?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Straight Shooter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-19-05 11:46 AM
Response to Original message
11. What part of "Fuck Saddam, we're taking him out" did they not understand?
How can it get any more clear than that? :banghead:

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rustydog Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-19-05 11:47 AM
Response to Original message
12. If it walks like a lying duck, quacks like a lying duck......
You got yourself a lying duck.

Misspoke, mislead, miscommunicated...try Fucking LIE!

This gutless bastard who saw fit to ditch his uniford during Vietnam lied to start Vietnam II and over 1700 real men and women who kept wearing their uniforms DIED for this cowards' lies.

Impeachment is the only cure for this disease.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
earth mom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-19-05 11:48 AM
Response to Original message
13. The doublespeak and lies has got to go!
:freak:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mopaul Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-19-05 01:08 PM
Response to Reply #13
15. doublespeak and double standards
we've put up with it too long. they are STILL blaming every fucking thing on that lyin' Clinton.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
earth mom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-19-05 03:27 PM
Response to Reply #15
21. Or on the so-called terrorists!
:eyes:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Supersedeas Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-19-05 12:06 PM
Response to Original message
14. Liz Bullllllmilller says that you can't say that the President lied
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LightningFlash Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-19-05 02:47 PM
Response to Original message
17. Bush giving his explanation: "I mislead you into war..."
Edited on Sun Jun-19-05 02:48 PM by LightningFlash
"Yes, I lied, hahaha and you all fell for it!!! Hahahahaha see? I actually 'mislead' you because everybody fell for my lies!!!"

Da Chimp. :mad: :mad: :mad: :mad:

"I also lied about winning the election, my crony artists stole it for me! I fooled you twice, me, me me me!! Hahahaha!"

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mopaul Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-19-05 02:50 PM
Response to Reply #17
18. now every american can absolve his guilt by saying, 'i was mislead'
just a spoon full of sugar helps the propaganda go down
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
PurityOfEssence Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-19-05 03:06 PM
Response to Original message
19. He lied to CONGRESS; that's the real point.
The very statement that he'd sincerely use diplomatic means is one of the biggest whoppers of all time. That he terrorized our representatives behind closed doors with deliberately overblown "evidence" and hid everything to the contrary. Had there not been a nuclear possibility, he never could have gotten the IWR passed even using the fear of the time and the impending election as he did.

He lied to get Congress to give up its right to declare war, and he even wanted full carte blanche to attack anyone he pleased; it was only Democrats who inserted language to restrict the war powers ONLY to actions against Iraq.

No, you weren't misled, and I remember reading your consistent postings at the time. I wasn't either, and you probably remember the same; not for a second did I think that we wouldn't launch an unprovoked military assault on a sovereign nation, and much as it's hard to contemplate such things, we only have to think of Panama and Grenada to know what ugliness contemporary conservatives have in their hearts.

Lying is bad. Lying to one's people is bad. Lying to Congress is illegal and an attempt to breach the terms of the Constitution.

We HAVE to force the verifiability of voting. It is the greatest danger to mankind today. All else is mere nuisance. If the House can be taken in '06, we shouldn't start impeachment hearings, we should call this vicious little nobody to testify, and get him on the record. This is the ugliest bit of foreign policy ever followed through by this country, and that's a damning statement when stacked up against the Mexican War, the Spanish-American War, the last century in Central America, Iran in 1953 and a host of other greedy forays.

May Junior live for 60 more years with what's left of his faculties intact; a narcissistic and petty bully needs to see his humiliation.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LightningFlash Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-19-05 03:48 PM
Response to Reply #19
22. Fix the voting, now. And force the resolution.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Vinca Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-19-05 03:10 PM
Response to Original message
20. It's like calling toast burned bread.
A lie by any other name is still a lie.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Dec 27th 2024, 03:46 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC