|
The environmental movement appears to be shying away from a very important issue in order to avoid controversy.
The issue I am talking about is the legalization of hemp. Hemp has so many environmental benefits, that it seems like any real environmentalist would like to see it legally cultivated in the United States. Afterall this is a plant that can produce high quality paper, meaning we can cut back on deforestation. It can also produce fabric that is superior to cotton, and can be grown without the heavy use of pesticides that cotton requires. It can produce bio-diesel fuel, which serves the dual purpose of cutting back our dependence on fossil fuels and reducing the impact of global warming.
And hemp has virtually no THC, meaning there is no way anyone could ever use it as a drug. There does not seem to be any logical reason to oppose the legalization of hemp, unless of course you are working for one of the corporations that financially benefits from the criminalization of hemp. For anyone else to oppose hemp, it is basically like opposing the cultivation of corn. Except it is even stupider than opposing corn, because hemp actually has more uses than corn does and is actually a more beneficial plant.
So why in the hell does it seem like environmental groups are completely ignoring this issue? I want to build the environmental movement, but it is difficult when we seem unable to even talk about real alternatives because we are afraid of being called "pro-drug".
|