MSNBC QOTD: Should the U.S. go after Osama bin Laden no matter what?

[sabra]

No matter what? huh?

<<SNIP>>
http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/3080261/#survey

Should the U.S. go after Osama bin Laden no matter what?

* 217 responses


Yes 81%
No 19%
<</SNIP>>

[gordianot]

1. Who is Osama bin Laden?

Does he have anything to do with Saddam Hussein?

:sarcasm:

[babylonsister]

2. Yeah, they should have in October '01, and

no one else. Stupid ass question.

[wakeme2008]

3. While I voted YES.... there is one exception.....

Not if Bush tells me he is in Iran.... I would not believe it.

[radwriter0555]

4. Let's see.. pretend OBL is hiding in IRAN...

hmm.....

[leesa]

5. He's dead.

[ikri]

9. The current administration hope he's dead

The only thing more embarrassing for * than Saddam Hussein finding where he left the receipts for the WMDs during his trial, would be Bin Laden turning up at his own trial with documentation on how much money and training the US provided to him and Al Qaeda to get them going.

[BrainRants]

6. I believe the correct answer is "No"

The phrase "no matter what" is too open ended and leaves too much room for interpretation on the part of idealogues pulling the military strings to further abuse our military as they see fit in the name of "the will of the people".

[Tim4319]

7. I thought that's what was happening!

[FloridaPat]

8. I would really like to see an investigation into who was behind 9-11.

We still don't know. At least the public still doesn't know. The government cover-up has been extensive. Then, when we find out who actually did 9-11, go after them.

[gordianot]

15. Which is why they will never allow themselves to leave office.

Imagine Warren Commision revisited such as the Schweiker-Hart Report years later.

Lots of forensic evidence ignored in the 9/11 Commission, how much destroyed?

= Death of American Voting rights. Only problem is some Republicans have not figured that out yet, just give them time next time they want to nominate a Presidential candidate outside of criminals who seized the Republican Party.

[Inland]

10. Didn't Bush already go after OBL with everything we had?

Guess not.

[MadAsHellNewYorker]

11. who the FUCK would vote no in this poll? n/t

[cynatnite]

12. badly worded question n/t

[Coexist]

13. I agree - no matter what could mean fire-bombing all of Afghanistan

for crying out loud - what a stupid question.

[DemonFighterLives]

14. I didn't vote

I would love to see ossie and dubby hang together for there New Pearl Harbor plan, but feeding the war machine with an endless search for a boogeyman, I can do without.

[BringEmOn]

16. Go after Emmanuel Goldstein? Another two-minute hate?

[bicentennial_baby]

17. Even if he's in....Iran?

C'mon people, you know it's coming...