Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Could the anti-Byrd attacks be any more hypocritical??

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
Bleacher Creature Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-20-05 04:22 PM
Original message
Could the anti-Byrd attacks be any more hypocritical??
I swear that I've seen no fewer than 10 links to stories about his KKK membership 50 years ago -- i.e. Yahoo!, Google, MSN, etc. At this point, I know that I shouldn't be surprised, but come on!! First off, he's apologized many times before. Second, where were all of the right-wingers, corporate-media whores, et. al when Strom Thurmond was giving a half-hearted apology, or when Jesse Helms (just a few weeks ago) refused to show any sense of regret.

Look, being a member of the KKK -- regardless of what the reason -- is a mark that a person can never, and should never fully be able to live down. But this crap with Byrd is just getting ridiculous.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
TheDebbieDee Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-20-05 04:37 PM
Response to Original message
1. They devoted a block of call-in time on C-SPAN......
this morning to Byrd's KKK roots! One repuke made mention of the notion that Democrats are keeping African-Americans enslaved through social programs.

I guess the repukes are trying to get Dems in Byrd's state to turn on him, but it's a well-known fact about Byrd's KKK roots (isn't it?), much like Mary Cheney's being a lesbian.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Touchdown Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-20-05 04:51 PM
Response to Reply #1
4. Easy "shut up!" on that meme.
"Democrats keep African Americans enslaved through social programs."

Answer... "So, only African Americans benefit from social programs? Is that why you want to get rid of them? My, how bigotted can a person get?"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BattyDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-20-05 04:42 PM
Response to Original message
2. Byrd held those beliefs 50 years ago and he has apologized many times ...
Edited on Mon Jun-20-05 04:43 PM by BattyDem

Many Repugs still hold those beliefs to this day and offer half-hearted apologies only when they are forced to.

That's the main difference between most Dems and most Repugs:

Dems are able to grow, learn and acknowledge when they are wrong. Repugs are stagnant.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ET Awful Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-20-05 04:46 PM
Response to Original message
3. As I said earlier, regardless of his past, Byrds was one name that
wasn't on the "nay" list for a senate resolution apologizing for inaction on anti-lynching laws.

In fact, I believe he voted yes on apologizing, unlike 20 of his Republican counterparts.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Adenoid_Hynkel Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-20-05 04:54 PM
Response to Original message
5. they have no prob with lott writing columns for a white supremicist
magazine put out by the CCC, something he tried to deny, but he was doing it well into the 90s.

the media is guning for byrd. here in wv, they're going out of their way to smear him and replace him with shelley moore capito, one of tom delay's top bootlickers (THE #2 RECIPIENT OF HIS DIRTY CAMPAIGN MONEY)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
theboss Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-20-05 05:12 PM
Response to Original message
6. Byrd made this fair game again with his book
These stories are triggered by Byrd's new book. They are not generated out of thin air.

And - as someone who knows and has voted for Byrd - I'm a little disturb by how genuinely fool of crap he appears in retelling the story of this part of his life. It's clear that he is cutting off his involvement at least a year too early. And his notion that it was just local "elits" in a social club does not work for me.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Dec 27th 2024, 05:11 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC