FROM:
http://www.downingstreetmemo.com/takeaction.htmlMore than a month after this document was published, the news media in the US had produced barely a trickle of reports on it (mostly coverage about the lack of coverage). Most of the news giants had ignored it entirely; some have belittled its significance while actually rebuffing citizens’ requests for serious news reporting. The last few days have seen some progress, more coverage and good questions being asked. We are confident, however, that a campaign to inundate these journalists with earnest requests will continue to keep their attention focused (just as the Washington Post finally produced some reports after a recent deluge of letters).
Thus our campaign: Every weekday in June, in cooperation with other activists and bloggers, we will publicize contact information for three distinct media outlets. We ask that you:
• Write a brief letter requesting the journalists to report on the Downing Street Memos, stating succinctly why you believe the leaked document is significant for the US.
• Send that letter as an email to each of the day’s three contacts.
• Return the next day and contact the next three targets of our media campaign. Here is the link:
http://www.downingstreetmemo.com/takeaction.htmlTARGETS FOR THURSEDAY, JUNE 23, 2005
1. Providence Journal, Washington Bureau Chief John Mulligan
email: jmulligan@belo-dc.com
phone: 202-661-8423
2. Richmond Times-Dispatch
contact EITHER
Louise Seals, Managing Editor
email: lseals@timesdispatch.com
phone: 804-649-6301
OR
Peter Hardin, Washington Correspondent
email: phardin@mediageneral.com
phone: 202-662-7669
fax: 202-662-7675
3. Dayton Daily News
contact EITHER
Managing Editor Steve Sidlo
email: steve_sidlo@coxohio.com
phone: 937-225-2224
OR
Washington Correspondent Jessica Wehrman
email: jwehrman@coxnews.com
phone: 202-887-8328
fax: 202-331-1055
The Providence Journal is a conservative paper for such a liberal state as RI. So far it has published only the dismissive op-ed by Michael Kinsley (6/15), and a short news story (6/11) about the ‘Briefing Paper’ that devotes only a few sentences to DSM. The ProJo’s coverage is less informative than what local TV stations in RI are providing.
The Richmond Times-Dispatch happens to be concerned about reaching more “under-35” readers, and it would be fair to make the point with Louise Seals that the Iraq war hits home much harder with draft-age men and women than even with older generations. Peter Hardin’s reporting from DC focuses heavily on stories with a Virginia angle, just as Jessica Wehrman’s reports focus on Ohioans; therefore both are listed (very much) as secondary contacts. The Dayton Daily News has published nothing on DSM so far.
Despite the memo’s disturbing and explosive revelations, there has been a virtual media blackout with some newspapers deliberately turning a blind eye to the Downing Street Memos. We hope you are already participating in the Awaken the Mainstreem Media campaign, and if you have time, contact other media outlets and ask them to do their job in reporting and investigating the information in the memo. Write a letter to the editor, call in to radio shows. It's time for the media to address real news.
MediaBlaster (Democratic Underground)—Here is the link:
http://www.democraticunderground.com/cu/cu.php?az=blasterMediaGuide (Townhall.com)—Here is the link:
http://capwiz.com/townhall/dbq/media/____________________________________
Here is my own personal letter:
SUBJ: Coverage of the Downing Street Minutes and questionable use of intelligence
Dear Sir/Madam:
As you know, on May 1 of this year a document now commonly referred to as “The Downing Street Memo” was released into the British Press. These minutes of a British cabinet meeting and several other recently released documents raise serious questions about how the administration was handling intelligence related to Iraq. At the very least, this documentation suggests that the Bush Administration was being disingenuous with the U.S. Congress and the American public on several gravely important issues.
The documentation strongly suggests that the Bush administration was determined to “fix intelligence” around a predetermined policy of war.
It is most disturbing that there has been little mention of any of these minutes of meetings between several senior British officials in much of the American media. Even more disturbing is the minimum coverage or discussion regarding strong, credible and independent evidence that the Bush Administration intentionally misled the U.S. Congress, the media and the American people.
I do hope you will address this issue and provide more in-depth and serious investigative journalism into this matter.
Sincerely,