The other day I posted the following:
It's a total set up...
First Goss(damn this is alot of work)head of the CIA says that we know were Osama is but we can't go after him. Citing sovereign nation bullshit, like that mattered with Iraq, but not naming the nation, then msnbc.com (tool of the admin*) has a vote question regarding, "should we go after Osama regardless of where he is?"
The turn out so far is overwhelming in favor of getting him.
Then moron* pictured on the cover of msnbc.com as being under fire.
I bet anything, that Osama, according to moron* and moron goss, want us to believe that he's in Iran. So for the first time, they will admit, according to public opinion, we should go after Osama and they will attack Iran.
Two things happen here, he will come across as listening to the American people and he will show some of that bullshit resolve he's always throwing about. Just mark my words.
Here is part two...
Today morons* media (msnbc.com)tool posts the following question: Do you think there are enough troops in Iraq to fight the insurgency?
I hate questions like this, total set up and either response can be used by moron to boost his agenda.
With that question in mind, and this article about how moron rumspuke has to answer some serious questions about Iraq
http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/8330207/sighting that progress has been slower than expected.
So with my above post and this new info. It appears to me that they are not only prepping for Iran, but they are most definitely going to have a draft.
All the arrows are pointing that way.
Lets recap.
msnbc asks should we go after Osama no matter where he is? then asks are there enough troops in Iraq to handle things?
It's now reported that they are doing drone flights over Iran, Goss "knows" where Osama is, but won't say and rumspuke is being called to the mat(yeah right) over the slow progress in Iraq. Drip drip drip...
I remember my dad once telling me, just watch the bullshit, the deeper it gets, the more likely we are going to war.