http://www.latimes.com/news/opinion/commentary/la-oe-smith23jun23,0,1838831.story?coll=la-news-comment-opinionsJune 23, 2005 latimes.com
COMMENTARY
The Real News in the Downing Street Memos
By Michael Smith, Michael Smith writes on defense issues for the Sunday Times of London.
It is now nine months since I obtained the first of the "Downing Street memos," thrust into my hand by someone who asked me to meet him in a quiet watering hole in London for what I imagined would just be a friendly drink.
At the time, I was defense correspondent of the London Daily Telegraph, and a staunch supporter of the decision to oust Saddam Hussein. The source was a friend. He'd given me a few stories before but nothing nearly as interesting as this.
The six leaked documents I took away with me that night were to change completely my opinion of the decision to go to war and the honesty of Prime Minister Tony Blair and President Bush.
They focused on the period leading up to the Crawford, Texas, summit between Blair and Bush in early April 2002, and were most striking for the way in which British officials warned the prime minister, with remarkable prescience, what a mess post-war Iraq would become. Even by the cynical standards of realpolitik, the decision to overrule this expert advice seemed to be criminal.
..more..
-Michael goes on to discuss another part of the memo that is arguably more important: U.S. aircraft patrolling the southern no-fly zone were dropping a lot more bombs in the hope of provoking a reaction, an average of 10 tons of bombs a month were dropped between May and August.