Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Iraqi Army - What its purpose truly is

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
lazarus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-23-05 06:47 PM
Original message
Iraqi Army - What its purpose truly is
This already was posted over in Editorials, but didn't get much discussion.

But I was thinking about this earlier, and then found this story to back me up.

Seriously, does a peaceful nation need a standing army of >200,000 for internal security? No. It needs a police force.

We all wondered where Bush would get his troops for excursion into Syria and Iran. And along comes "former Pentagon official, journalist, and president of the Council on Foreign Relations, Leslie Gelb."

''If you ask any Iraqi leader, they will tell you these people can't fight. They just aren't trained. And yet we're cranking them out like rabbits." As for plans to train a 10 division Iraqi army by next year, Gelb was scathing. ''It became very apparent to me that these 10 divisions were to fight some future war against Iran. It had nothing to do, nothing to do," with taking Iraq over from the Americans and fighting the insurgents.


So there's BushCo's army. The nice thing from BushCo's perspective is, they don't even have to be trained all that well. They're cannon fodder. Our air superiority will do most of the killings. We just need these guys to absorb some bullets taking the ground when we're done bombing it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
jody Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-23-05 06:57 PM
Response to Original message
1. The Iraqi army will enforce control on the ground backed up by
air support provided by US forces. That way Iraqis take most of the casualties but are subservient to US military forces.

Bush can declare a victory before the campaigns start for 2006 and maybe Repugs can retain control of both houses.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Niccolo_Macchiavelli Donating Member (641 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-23-05 07:03 PM
Response to Original message
2. ummm yes that will work out quite well i'm assured
the iraqi army, which is not infiltrated by resistance agents and perhaps fought alongside with shias from iraq (if not beeing oneself), badr militia brigades against US forces.

the pictures of the defecting ires in braveheart movie come to my mind.

Attack them from the air and send reinforcements on the ground...could get interesting.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jimshoes Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-23-05 07:09 PM
Response to Original message
3. Seeing as how our Iraq adventure is
going so well, an Iran air campaign with a ground invasion using untrained Iraqi soldiers has all the earmarks of an unparalleled fiasco. I can't help but thinking these guys have watched "The Man Who Would Be King" once too often. The indigenous people won out in the end in the movie. I keep thinking the same thing is going to happen in the real world. (As opposed to the fantasy world bushco lives in)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kraklen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-23-05 07:10 PM
Response to Original message
4. Wouldn't work.
That'd be like building a South Vietnamese Army to invade Cambodia. It.. ahh... hmmm.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Dec 27th 2024, 04:41 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC