This already was posted over in
Editorials, but didn't get much discussion.
But I was thinking about this earlier, and then found
this story to back me up.
Seriously, does a peaceful nation need a standing army of >200,000 for internal security? No. It needs a police force.
We all wondered where Bush would get his troops for excursion into Syria and Iran. And along comes "former Pentagon official, journalist, and president of the Council on Foreign Relations, Leslie Gelb."
''If you ask any Iraqi leader, they will tell you these people can't fight. They just aren't trained. And yet we're cranking them out like rabbits." As for plans to train a 10 division Iraqi army by next year, Gelb was scathing. ''It became very apparent to me that these 10 divisions were to fight some future war against Iran. It had nothing to do, nothing to do," with taking Iraq over from the Americans and fighting the insurgents.
So there's BushCo's army. The nice thing from BushCo's perspective is, they don't even have to be trained all that well. They're cannon fodder. Our air superiority will do most of the killings. We just need these guys to absorb some bullets taking the ground when we're done bombing it.