Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

U.S. proposes rules for safer skyscraper after 9/11

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
cynatnite Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-23-05 11:32 PM
Original message
U.S. proposes rules for safer skyscraper after 9/11
NEW YORK (Reuters) - The U.S. government on Thursday unveiled recommendations for building safer skyscrapers based on lessons learned from the Sept. 11, 2001, attacks, but cautioned the new standards were not meant to protect against another hijacked plane attack.

A three-year probe into the collapse of the World Trade Center towers that killed 2,749 people produced 30 recommendations for improved structural integrity, enhanced fire resistance materials, better evacuation procedures and communications systems for police and firefighters.

"Our recommendations are for a normal range of events. We were not measuring how a high-rise building would withstand an airplane impact," said Dr. Shyam Sunder, lead investigator for the National Institute of Standards and Technology's 10,000-page study. "It is better to keep terrorists away from airplanes and keep airplanes away from buildings."

The agency recommended fortifying and fireproofing horizontal beams and trusses in floors and not just the building's support columns -- something Sunder said could save lives.

http://news.yahoo.com/s/nm/20050624/ts_nm/security_skyscrapers_dc
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
tuvor Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-23-05 11:33 PM
Response to Original message
1. Rule #1:
Read the fucking PDBs.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BattyDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-23-05 11:36 PM
Response to Original message
2. Rule number one should be ...
"Make sure no one tells NORAD to stand down" :eyes:

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AllyCat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-23-05 11:37 PM
Response to Original message
3. If one believes MIHOP: Keep the demolition guys out of the basement
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SnoopDog Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-23-05 11:38 PM
Response to Original message
4. This is easy...
Make sure the president doesn't order up a new 911.
Make sure the administration does not order the military to stand down.
Make sure that explosives are not pre-installed.
Make sure the FAA reacts properly to rouge aircraft.

That should do it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Burried News Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-23-05 11:57 PM
Response to Original message
5. Thank you for posting this - please note according to it the WTC
did not conform to either NY or NJ building codes. The NY Port Authority is a superagency state; laws did not apply to it except as allowed by its charter. The stairwells had walls that were only two layers of sheetrock, not concrete block as NY code would require. They were easily penetrated and their failure relates directly to how few above the fires escaped. Truly a very good example of Burried News.:cry:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Name removed Donating Member (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-24-05 12:35 AM
Response to Reply #5
7. Deleted message
Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
 
Burried News Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-24-05 01:30 AM
Response to Reply #7
8. I know the feeling. Good work friend.
I am new here and wanted to post it yesterday but did not know how.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lumpy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-24-05 01:47 AM
Response to Reply #5
9. Please give us a reliable source that
confirms that the towers didn't conform to the NY building codes and perhaps we might believe you.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cynatnite Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-24-05 01:51 AM
Response to Reply #9
10. Here's a source:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
leesa Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-24-05 12:00 AM
Response to Original message
6. Just keep the Bushes away with their explosives.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Dec 27th 2024, 05:51 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC