What did bush say RIGHT after 9/11 about not letting countries hide

[southernleftylady]

terrorist?
i just heard a repug say this:
'I think they have known for a very long time where he is. They can't go in and get him without causing another possible war (with Pakistan). Not something they want to do'

didnt he say he would accept that? or no?

[BlueEyedSon]

1. You are with US or you are with the TERRA-ISTS

oops, policy change!

[dogday]

2. If you give comfort to the Terrorist , you are with the Terrorist

If you harbor a terrorist, you are with the terrorist...

[cynatnite]

4. In other words...if yur not with amurka...yur a terrist n/t

[bklyncowgirl]

3. Actually I betcha it's Saudi Arabia

The way Goss talked about the diplomatic niceties involved with going in and getting the bastard sounded like

1. A country in which OBL is protected by high authorities--Musharef would probably love to nab OBL because it would give him a chance to crack down on his own fundamentalists.

2. It's a country which even Shrub doesn't want to piss off. A lightning raid into Pakistan would be business as usual.

Saudi Arabia fits better than Pakistan.

[Beaver Tail]

5. Two Words

Flip Flop

[leesa]

6. He's dead and they've painted themselves into a corner because they

made the obviously fake "confession" tape and several others since then, including the one they made prior to the "election". He had a terminal disease for God's sake folks...he was on dialysis long before 9-11. His obit was published in 12/01.

[ComerPerro]

7. Yeah. Aren't countries that harbor terrorists our enemies?

Why not pre-emptively invade?

Is he worried about public opinion? Because I was under the impression, based on right wing talking points, that Bush was a cowboy who didn't care about opinion polls and would do what is necessary to do what's right.