But that's not a litmus test, right? They don't do litmus tests, right?
http://www.washingtontimes.com/national/20050624-120919-5576r.htmWhite House spokesman Scott McClellan said again yesterday that "there's no vacancy that exists at this point."
However,
the Christian Legal Society has been asked to provide its recommendations for a replacement for Chief Justice William H. Rehnquist, 80, who has thyroid cancer. The group complied. The spokesman acknowledged yesterday that the White House has "made preparations to be ready in case someone does leave the Supreme Court." The court's summer session ends Thursday, and there is rampant speculation that Chief Justice Rehnquist will announce as early as Monday that he is stepping down.
In what amounts to the opening salvo of what many expect will be a contentious battle, top Democrats on Capitol Hill yesterday urged Mr. Bush to consult with them on any nominee to help avoid the kind of partisan wrangling that engulfed his lower-court picks.
"The way to avoid the divisiveness and discord that occurred over past judicial nominations is through consensus and cooperation in the selection of future candidates," 43 of the Senate's 44 Democrats and its lone independent said in a letter to the White House.