Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Words of Thomas Jefferson regarding the SCOTUS decision

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
Walt Starr Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-24-05 01:06 PM
Original message
Words of Thomas Jefferson regarding the SCOTUS decision
We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness. --That to secure these rights, Governments are instituted among Men, deriving their just powers from the consent of the governed, --That whenever any Form of Government becomes destructive of these ends, it is the Right of the People to alter or to abolish it, and to institute new Government, laying its foundation on such principles and organizing its powers in such form, as to them shall seem most likely to effect their Safety and Happiness.... when a long train of abuses and usurpations, pursuing invariably the same Object evinces a design to reduce them under absolute Despotism, it is their right, it is their duty, to throw off such Government, and to provide new Guards for their future security.

Emphasis mine...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
MadHound Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-24-05 01:08 PM
Response to Original message
1. I hear you brother, I hear you
And one thing that might come out of this POS is that enough people will finally wake up and smell the Plutocracy strong enough to make them realize what is going on, and then take action.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Walt Starr Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-24-05 01:13 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. He who is the enemy of this ruling
is my ally.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
warsager Donating Member (265 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-24-05 01:16 PM
Response to Original message
3. Insurgent
Edited on Fri Jun-24-05 01:21 PM by warsager
I heard a very good point today on kpfk, a point which I have heard before but no one seems to speak about.

The definition of an insurgent is one who fights against their own government. The Iraqi's that are fighting the occupying US forces are NOT insurgents. This term is a *tool* of Bu$hCO to demonized the Iraqi's that are fighting against the colonization of their country by the US. No one should EVER use this word when referring to the resistance by Iraqi's. Same thing goes for terrorist in my opinion.

Insurgent
1 : a person who revolts against civil authority or an established government; especially : a rebel not recognized as a belligerent
2 : one who acts contrary to the policies and decisions of one's own political party

NOW WE over here in the US, need to become insurgents, isn't it our "duty, to throw off such Government, and to provide new Guards for our future security."!!!??

Great post, I just wish more people cared.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MadHound Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-24-05 01:26 PM
Response to Reply #3
4. Don't dispair friend, more people just started caring
Look, some people are on the left, some people are on the right. Some own and love guns, some people hate them. This sort of division goes right down the line on a lot of issues. But everybody, on both sides of politics has property, and the vast majority are outraged by this POS decision. They're out there right now, getting pissed in a righeous bipartisan fashion. Give them a chance to figure out what to do, and you could be seeing a lot of insurgency in this country.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Walt Starr Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-24-05 01:27 PM
Response to Reply #3
5. If I must, so be it
I should be standing on the property of those whose property is being taken by a tyrannical government with weapon in hand in complete solidarity.

Were this my property, the government would have to kill me before they could take it to line the pockets of a paper fiction and the campaign coffers of greedy, self dealing, corrupt, slimeball politicians.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
warsager Donating Member (265 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-24-05 01:55 PM
Response to Reply #5
6. Did you read the post
About the majority of Americans think that the Iraqi prisoners have been treated "about right" or "better than they deserve"? It's like we are living in a fantasy land. People are so oblivious to the truth. It feels impossible to get people to know what's really happening, let alone care, AND then want to do something about it.

But I heard today that more and more Republicans are starting to ask for a timeline for pulling out of Iraq. Maybe the more people start to stand up, the more they will realize how Bu$hCO cares NOTHING about what Americans want, think, feel, or need.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
GodHelpUsAll2 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-24-05 06:57 PM
Response to Reply #5
10. We all should be
There should be an influx to New London.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bohemianguy Donating Member (61 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-24-05 02:18 PM
Response to Original message
7. this issue crosses all lines
It's amazing seeing the reaction in my neck of the woods to the abominable SC decision. A conservative Bush voter I work with is as outraged as I am. People I've talked with who before today have shown absolutely *zero* interest in politics and current events, told me today they're writing their senators and representatives about it (after looking up who they were, of course).

There's an opportunity here for politicians at all levels to gain a lot of political capital if they stand firm against and loudly denounce this property-stealing pro-corporate bullshit.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Walt Starr Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-24-05 06:43 PM
Response to Reply #7
8. As evidenced by DU
some on the left actually support this abominable ruling.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
femme.democratique Donating Member (969 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-24-05 06:51 PM
Response to Original message
9. This is just proof that the govt. takeover was a conspiracy over decades!!
They're all corrupt now, thanks to the corrupt Presidents that nominated them!!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
noiretextatique Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-24-05 07:03 PM
Response to Original message
11. amen
bush v. gore is an abomination :patriot:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Dec 27th 2024, 05:50 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC