Torn between the canidates

[Democrats unite]

While I sit here not being able to sleep, I have come to the realization that I like in alpabetical order Clark, Dean, Edwards, Gephardt, Graham, Kerry.

I do appreciate the debates I have seen here, but when it comes down to it, I will be voting for the one person who has impressed me most from what I have heard them say & not what people say here.

I guess my point is I think the majority of people here probably feel the same way. When I see someone bashing a Democratic candidate here for any reason, it just makes me want to avoid that persons post in the future, which is defeating the purpose of your post to begin with.

Hope this makes sense.

EDIT SPELLING

[dobak]

1. me too

my order is the same, except Kucinich would be ahead of Edwards

[Bertrand]

3. Dobak

the "even him" over lieberman is hilarious. i love your banner.

[nadinbrzezinski]

2. Okay find the closest that meets your expectations

For me right now that is Dean.

The primaries work for that candidate, after those are over
get behind whoever gets the nod

[caledesi]

4. Understandable. We have some GREAT candidates.

That's the beauty of this. Almost any of them (except for you-know-who) will beat *.

[Clark Can WIN]

5. My advice would be to pay more attention to your own eyes

and ears during the debates. I would definately give more weight to my own senses than DU or the mass media. According to DU and the MM they are all wildmen and crazies (except for Lieberman and Mosely-Braun on the MM) and potentially disasterous massive failures.

[Brucey]

6. Yes, there are lots of us at DU who will support ABB,

and right now we like a lot of the Dem candidates. I'm leaning toward Dean now, but could be swayed to Kerry. I like the others, but am not convinced yet that they will be able to win. Clark is too recently in the race for me to make a judgment, though I am leery about a military person as civilian leader.