Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Agriculture Department Hid Mad Cow Results for MONTHS

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
Celebration Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-25-05 07:32 PM
Original message
Agriculture Department Hid Mad Cow Results for MONTHS
http://www.nytimes.com/2005/06/26/national/26beef.html

The delay in confirming the United States' second case of mad cow disease seems to underscore what critics of the agency have said for a long time: that there are serious and systemic problems in the way the Agriculture Department tests animals for mad cow.

Until Friday, it was not public knowledge that an "experimental" test had been performed last November by an Agriculture Department laboratory on the brain of a cow suspected of having mad cow disease, and that the test had come up positive......snip

For seven months, all that was known was that a test on the same cow done at the same laboratory at roughly the same time had come up negative. The negative result was obtained using a test that the Agriculture Department refers to as its "gold standard." .......snip

"The laboratory folks just never mentioned it to anyone higher up," said Ed Loyd, an Agriculture Department spokesman. "They didn't know if it was valid or not, so they didn't report it."


The "experimental" test is used routinely in Japan and Britain!! How can they spin this one???
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Quakerfriend Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-25-05 07:51 PM
Response to Original message
1. This has been going on for years, actually.
More than 15 cases of Mad Cow going back years in NJ- all had eaten at the same racetrack!

A good friend of one of the victims has been the one to bring the story out.

Sorry, no link!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
newswolf56 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-25-05 07:53 PM
Response to Original message
2. Once again, the Bush Administration lies. This is...
...precisely why I stopped eating beef some time ago: my assumption that BushCo would lie (and do everything else within its power) to protect the profits of the agrobeef monopoly.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
journalist3072 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-25-05 07:56 PM
Response to Original message
3. Hiding information
This seems to be a theme under the Bush administration....hide embarrassing information,or at least downplay it. It reminds me of how the Department of Health & Human Services watered down a report on racial disparities in health care. They edited the report, and made it less critical of the imbalanaces in health care, than the original report.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ken-in-seattle Donating Member (195 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-25-05 07:56 PM
Response to Original message
4. current sec of ag is a wingnut son of a dairy farmer
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DeepModem Mom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-25-05 07:56 PM
Response to Original message
5. OMG! These people do not govern, they do not protect public safety --
they do nothing except push their extremist agenda and enrich their supporters/enablers. May they, on some day of reckoning, receive their just reward.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
achtung_circus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-25-05 08:00 PM
Response to Original message
6. Well, I knew,
as did most Canadians in the beef industry. So did R-CALF USA. We who pay attention knew, but the news was not widely disseminated outside people who care about cows.

Most people only pay attention to their food supply when something goes wrong.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
proud2BlibKansan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-25-05 08:01 PM
Response to Original message
7. Remember the day when
ketchup was a vegetable?
http://www.straightdope.com/columns/040716.html

Good ole USDA. Hasn't changed a bit in 20 years.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LiberalAndProud Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-25-05 08:02 PM
Response to Original message
8. What did Johanns know and when did he know it?


Mike Johanns was sworn in as the 28th Secretary of the U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) on January 21, 2005.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
journalist3072 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-25-05 08:05 PM
Response to Original message
9. Hiding Information- Part II
Isn't hiding, or purposefully providing misleading, information grounds for impeachment?

We need to start collecting all of the instances where under Bush, our government agencies have purposefully hidden or provided false or misleading information. Send it to your Senators.

Here are the instances I know of:

1. The White House pressured the Environmental Agency into editing it's report on the air quality in and around Ground Zero. The White House deleted cautionary statements, and inserted more reassuring ones. The problem was, they didn't have the information to back up those more reassuring statements.

2. The Department of HHS edited its own report on racial disparties in health care, making it so that the report was less critical of the racial imbalances in health care.


I say this is grounds for impeachment.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Celebration Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-26-05 05:17 AM
Response to Reply #9
10. also
http://www.wsws.org/articles/2005/jun2005/coon-j18.shtml

"A Bush aide who reportedly altered government climate reports to favor the interests of the oil industry has resigned from the administration to take a job at ExxonMobil, the world’s largest energy company and most fervent opponent of carbon emissions regulations. For the aide, Philip Cooney, the move completes a cycle in which he has served the interests of the oil giants both in and out of government."

With no science experience, he just omitted paragraphs from the report and shaded other opinions by wording them.

Then there are all the lies about Iraq, etc.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
journalist3072 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-26-05 09:55 AM
Response to Reply #10
11. It just doesn't stop, does it? n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Dec 27th 2024, 04:28 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC