Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

LAT: "...an indictment for exposing Plame now seems unlikely"

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
Rose Siding Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-26-05 10:23 AM
Original message
LAT: "...an indictment for exposing Plame now seems unlikely"
In its coverage of "Reporters Await Fallout of Not Naming Sources"...

snip>
Lawyers who have closely watched Fitzgerald's investigation said they thought the Republican prosecutor appeared to be bending over backward to show he was thoroughly exploring potentially illegal leaks by a Republican White House. But an indictment for exposing Plame now seems unlikely, they said, because her identity was already known in Washington and because it would be difficult to prove an intent to harm U.S. intelligence.

Legal experts said it seemed more likely that Fitzgerald would seek perjury or obstruction of justice charges....

http://www.latimes.com/news/nationworld/nation/la-na-sources26jun26,0,2850709,print.story

That's not even the worst news! Worse, there's a chance that essential press freedoms will be contorted into a vehicle for the govt to manipulate the public.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
hlthe2b Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-26-05 10:30 AM
Response to Original message
1. "HER identity?!!!!!!!"
Isn't that NEW?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU9598 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-26-05 10:39 AM
Response to Reply #1
3. Her = Plame n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hlthe2b Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-26-05 11:13 AM
Response to Reply #3
5. yes... I didn't read closely...
you are right.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kittenpants Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-26-05 10:32 AM
Response to Original message
2. why are they "potentially illegal leaks"?
it seems to me that leaking a CIA agents identity to the press is w/o question illegal & treasonous.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sam sarrha Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-26-05 10:42 AM
Response to Original message
4. But he did Deliberately HARM.. and endanger after being told NOT TO
:wtf: That needed an INDEPENDANT INVESTIGATOR> not a F'n Lacky
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
realFedUp Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-26-05 11:26 AM
Response to Original message
6. Miller would not ask her sources to waive their anonymity.
snip from LA Times story:

Several prominent journalists who worked on the Plame story received subpoenas. A few — such as Walter Pincus of the Washington Post and Tim Russert of NBC — avoided the possibility of jail when their sources agreed the journalists no longer had to keep their identities secret. It remains a mystery whether Novak had to testify. He has declined to comment.

Miller would not ask her sources to waive their anonymity. She said intelligence officials might feel coerced into admitting they had talked to a reporter. Cooper initially answered the prosecutor's questions, with the agreement of one of his sources, but the reporter declined to answer when Fitzgerald came back for more information.

As a result, U.S. District Judge Thomas F. Hogan cited Miller — who never wrote about the Plame case — and Cooper for contempt. Hogan's action has been upheld by two appellate panels, leading to the Supreme Court appeal.

continued
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Dec 27th 2024, 04:02 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC