As just received via email:
With the president stuck in a quagmire over his choice of U.N. ambassador, people are saying
it's time for our side to take the initiative and suggest our own alternatives. Why is this such a good idea?
First, it demonstrates to the American people in a positive way, "These are the kind of nominees you would get IF YOU ELECTED US."
Second, it forces the president to turn his nose up at each and every one of 2-5 strong candidates.
And third, it further shows the intransigence of a president incapable of admitting or correcting his mistakes, regardless of how apparent the failure of his policies is to everyone else.
We should tell our senators we need to hold a PRESS CONFERENCE this coming week and do just exactly that.http://www.usalone.com/unambassador.htmAnd while we're at it,
why don't we condemn Karl Rove for his despicable comments attacking those who are now opposed to his disatrous Iraq occupation? Last time we checked the Afghanistan resolution passed in both houses with only one dissenting vote. It's just another attempt to rewrite history with a smear.
http://www.usalone.com/rove.htmMembers of Congress, from left to right, Maxine Waters (D-Calif.), Sheila Jackson Lee (D-Texas), John Conyers Jr. (D-Mich.), and Barbara Lee (D-Calif.) head down Pennsylvania Avenue to the White House, June 16, to deliver petitions demanding President Bush tell the truth on Downing Street Memo evidence that he lied to sell the Iraq war to the American people. http://www.pww.org/article/articleview/7266/1/275/ "... we sent our young people into harm's way without leveling with the American people." - Congresswoman Pelosi before Congress, 16 June 2005
Peace. www.missionnotaccomplished.us - Any candidate worthy of our vote in the 2006 Congressional elections should have filed charges against Bu$h and the neoconsters before March 19 2006.