Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Intelligence Brief: Uzbekistan---(Rummy's 'lilypad' strategy weaknesses)

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
Gloria Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-26-05 10:03 PM
Original message
Intelligence Brief: Uzbekistan---(Rummy's 'lilypad' strategy weaknesses)
From the new World Media Watch up now at http://www.zianet.com/insightanalytical
Tomorrow at Buzzflash.com



2//Power and Interest News Report, US 23 June, 2005

http://www.pinr.com/report.php?ac=view_report&report_id=318&language_id=1



INTELLIGENCE BRIEF: UZBEKISTAN

By Dr Michael A Weinstein

The announcement on June 16 that Uzbekistan had banned night flights into and out of the US air base in Khanabad marks the first serious geostrategic fallout from Washington's ambivalent response to the violent suppression by Tashkent of mass protests against the regime of President Islam Karimov in May in the city of Andijan.

The Khanabad base, which supports US military operations in neighboring Afghanistan, is a key component in US Defense Secretary Donald Rumsfeld's redeployment policy, which envisions the substitution of large concentrations of troops in Europe and South Korea with smaller "lily-pad" deployments in weaker acquiescent states in northeast Africa and Eurasia. The aims of Rumsfeld's plan are to protect strategic energy supplies, curb destabilizing moves by Islamic revolutionaries throughout the vast region, and counter initiatives unfavorable to Washington's interests by Moscow and Beijing.

As an immediate result of Tashkent's action, Washington has had to move some aircraft to Afghanistan and mount resupply operations from its base in Kyrgyzstan, adding to expenses and detracting from efficiency. From a longer-term perspective, the flight limitations are a signal to Washington that the Karimov regime is prepared to sacrifice US-Uzbek relations and, perhaps, even to eliminate the US military presence in Uzbekistan, if Washington does not give it a free hand in its efforts to suppress dissent.

Tashkent denied on June 18 that its slap at Washington was related to Andijan and said the flight limitations had been in the works for a long time and Washington "knew why". Whatever the case, the restrictions, which are neither decisive nor final, reveal underlying weaknesses in the Rumsfeld strategy, which depends for its success on compliant governments where the lily pads are located.

MORER
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
patrice Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-26-05 10:18 PM
Response to Original message
1. ". . . . suppress dissent."
Civil Liberties? or Genocide?

What about Democracy in Uzbekistan?

So how many "lillypads" are there supposed to be? Can we give one up and stay out of other people's politics?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LynnTheDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-27-05 04:27 AM
Response to Original message
2. Listed first; "protect strategic energy supplies"
Edited on Mon Jun-27-05 04:27 AM by LynnTheDem
We IGNORE MASSACRES in order to protect strategic energy supplies. OIL.

Wake the fuck up, America.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Mar 13th 2025, 06:31 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC