Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Do you think the Bush admin cringes every time Rummy does an interview?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
sabra Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-27-05 08:39 AM
Original message
Do you think the Bush admin cringes every time Rummy does an interview?
Considering the guy has submitted his resignation twice already... Every time he does an interview he just continues putting his foot in his mouth...

- Iraq fighting could go on for years
- Negotiating with the "terrorists"
- When Cheney said last throes, he meant....

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
whistle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-27-05 08:41 AM
Response to Original message
1. The 40 year Iraq war at $150 billion per year will result in...
...$6.0 trillion spent in Iraq.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
peekaloo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-27-05 08:49 AM
Response to Original message
2. Probably not. The blind leading the incompetent.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NewJeffCT Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-27-05 08:50 AM
Response to Original message
3. what did Rummy say about last throes?
I was out of the loop yesterday...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sabra Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-27-05 08:52 AM
Response to Reply #3
4. defended it
<<SNIP>>
http://egyptelection.com/modules.php?name=News&file=article&sid=1636

Rumsfeld defended Vice President Dick Cheney's recent statement that the insurgents are in their "last throes," saying there are many ways to measure their strength. "If you look up 'last throes,' it can mean a violent last throe," Rumsfeld said on ABC's "This Week."
<</SNIP>>
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NewJeffCT Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-27-05 08:55 AM
Response to Reply #4
5. I see...
Didn't they say the same thing just about 2 years ago - you know, around when Bush told them to "Bring it on"??

Remember how we howled at the Orwellian double-speak when he said that the more violent attacks means the Rebellion, I mean, the insurgents were more desparate?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bdot Donating Member (298 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-27-05 08:59 AM
Response to Original message
6. Probably like how everyone else cringes everytime Bush tries to speak.
"heh heh heh"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tesla Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-27-05 09:02 AM
Response to Reply #6
7. Where are we going to get that kind of ca$h?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EST Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-27-05 09:17 AM
Response to Original message
8. Not at all.
He is their star performer, given that whatever it is they appear to be doing is rarely what they are actually doing and their star obfuscation operator is always such a thrill to see in action. The war in Iraq and other ugly aggression they are putting America through are thoroughly real, of course, but their plans for running the world and and holding seven billion people hostage are not nearly so straight forward.
Putting out a host of conflicting misinformation is in keeping with both character and the notion that the resulting confusion and upset will, with the fact that most people will hear what they are attuned to and miss the rest, get them another ten percent on the popularity parade, which is still a small essential in governing.
That, along with the "you can fool some of the people all the time" rule keeps a 35% to 40% floor under their endeavors. That thirty five percent punctuated with intimidation and control of voting machinery coupled to a "piss on the opposition attitude," will serve to keep them in power, even though the faces may change.
A hard focus on the conflicting views may have some impact, but, since our non-rethug leadership is largely is sympathy with the majority of neocon notions, the buzz created by the more outrageous lies is merely the scum on the vast swamp of public deceit and probably helps them as much as it drags.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Dec 27th 2024, 05:56 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC