Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

One of The Women Killed on Thurs. Was a Naval Reservist?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
leftchick Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-27-05 10:38 AM
Original message
One of The Women Killed on Thurs. Was a Naval Reservist?
Edited on Mon Jun-27-05 11:11 AM by leftchick
Why in the hell was she even there? This makes me sick...



In this undated photo provided by Kerry Clark, Regina Clark, left, of Centralia, Wash., is shown during her 2003 deployment in Kuwait City with an unidentified buddy, right. Clark, 43, a Naval reservist was killed in Iraq when a suicide car bomber attacked her convoy outside Fallujah on Thursday, June 23, 2005, a Navy spokeswoman told The Chronicle of Centralia. (AP Photo

link for rating it...

http://news.yahoo.com/photos/ss/events/iraq/082701iraqplane/im:/050627/480/wacen10206270333;_ylt=Akp7qVTPfpFkSHf8UJoefmcZO7gF;_ylu=X3oDMTA5bGcyMWMzBHNlYwNzc25hdg--

edit: More about her at this link. Thanks to PassingFair..

http://seattletimes.nwsource.com/html/localnews/2002349229_iraqmom27m.html

~snip~

In the Naval Reserve, Clark, a petty officer first class, was slotted as a mess-hall cook. And preparing food was a big part of her duties in earlier deployments in 2001 and 2003, according to Haubrick.


But this year, as she arrived in Iraq, the Marines, in an effort to be culturally sensitive to Muslim women, sought to find U.S. women to do the checkpoint searches, according to a Marine press release.

Fallujah has been one of the most treacherous towns for U.S. troops and was the focal point of a major U.S. offensive last fall that sought to flush out insurgents. But in a phone call a few weeks ago with her mother, Clark did not talk about the dangers of her job.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
ewagner Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-27-05 10:40 AM
Response to Original message
1. The bio has to
show up pretty soon...

why is the MSM sitting on this?

assholes!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
PassingFair Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-27-05 10:41 AM
Response to Original message
2. Thank you, Lefty!
I was looking for pictures...can you drop this into the thread theorizing a cover-up of the full extent of this massacre?
Also LOVE the Galloway shot. I wish I looked that wrathful.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
leftchick Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-27-05 10:44 AM
Response to Reply #2
3. do you have a link?
Galloway kicks major ass! :)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
PassingFair Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-27-05 10:49 AM
Response to Reply #3
6. This one...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lenidog Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-27-05 10:47 AM
Response to Original message
4. What is her MOS that should explain why she was there
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
The Backlash Cometh Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-27-05 10:48 AM
Response to Original message
5. Well, I didn't want to say it but...
someone told me that his brother in the Navy was being shipped out to Iraq. I thought it was odd, and I was wondering:

(1) Is the backdoor draft opening wider because of the low enlistment numbers?

(2) Or is there one last push in the making?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MissB Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-27-05 10:50 AM
Response to Reply #5
7. There were some posts on this last week
I think some people were suggesting that the armed forces were trying to fill some gaps with Navy personnel - think medics and other non-front-line positions.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
unhappycamper Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-27-05 11:01 AM
Response to Reply #7
13. Correction to your post: A medic IS a front-line position.
She may not have been a combat medic, but forward hospitals are - forward.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
leftchick Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-27-05 11:10 AM
Response to Reply #13
14. Her job was supposed to be a mess hall cook...
Edited on Mon Jun-27-05 11:36 AM by leftchick
but that was then... :(

http://seattletimes.nwsource.com/html/localnews/2002349229_iraqmom27m.html

~snip~

In the Naval Reserve, Clark, a petty officer first class, was slotted as a mess-hall cook. And preparing food was a big part of her duties in earlier deployments in 2001 and 2003, according to Haubrick.


But this year, as she arrived in Iraq, the Marines, in an effort to be culturally sensitive to Muslim women, sought to find U.S. women to do the checkpoint searches, according to a Marine press release.

Fallujah has been one of the most treacherous towns for U.S. troops and was the focal point of a major U.S. offensive last fall that sought to flush out insurgents. But in a phone call a few weeks ago with her mother, Clark did not talk about the dangers of her job.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
northzax Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-27-05 11:20 AM
Response to Reply #7
17. and Marines always have navy corpsmen
with them. There are no Marine medics, only Navy.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pocket Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-27-05 12:06 PM
Response to Reply #7
19. the Marine Corps does not have it's own medics
they use Navy Corpsmen. Always have.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
leftchick Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-27-05 10:50 AM
Response to Reply #5
8. I think they are grabbing anyone and everyone they can
I wonder if any Coast Guard are there? I used to work for a guy in the Naval reserve many years ago. He is about 54 years old now and retired. I wonder if he has been called back. His field was medicine so it would not surprise me.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
me b zola Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-27-05 11:56 AM
Response to Reply #5
18. The Navy Reserves works a bit differently than regular Navy
A persons rate (mos) often does not indicate what job they perform in the Reserves. For instance, a person's rate could be an SK (store keeper), but if they are in a cargo handling unit, when they go on an OP their job will be either a crane operator or hold boss or hatch captain, or what ever. Everyone in that unit must train & pass classes in a number of things in order to be mission ready for that unit.If a cargo handling unit specializes in moving ammo, their training will be more extensive and they must pass more classes & exams.

After 9/11 the Navy Reserves required everyone to complete & keep updated a skills assessment. This was meant to have a pool of individual people that could be mobilized to perform certain functions for the military.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
unhappycamper Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-27-05 10:53 AM
Response to Original message
9. She had an 18-year old son.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Sadie5 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-27-05 10:54 AM
Response to Original message
10. Rummy said yesterday
on c-span that there was no shortage of Army personnel. We had it all wrong! The recruit #'s had been upped, so...thats why we needed more bodies. Liar!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Vickers Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-27-05 10:55 AM
Response to Original message
11. When I worked at NORAD, we had squids in there
and that's inside a MOUNTAIN. :crazy:

Could be a communications technician, a linguist, etc. etc.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Codeine Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-27-05 10:59 AM
Response to Original message
12. A lot of medical types
...serving with the Marines are Navy personelle.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
leftchick Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-27-05 11:12 AM
Response to Reply #12
16. no medical background for her...
I just added a link to the OP. This is very sad. :(
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TahitiNut Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-27-05 11:12 AM
Response to Original message
15. Is the puzzlement due to her being in the Navy or being female?
Edited on Mon Jun-27-05 11:18 AM by TahitiNut
It's a misconception to think that Naval forces are restricted to service exclusively aboard ships and boats. (Purely from a pop perspective, viewing the "Sand Pebbles" should disabuse people from such a notion.) It's common for medical corpsmen and other specialty MOS's (e.g. Navy SEALs) to serve wherever their training is applicable. Even further, the military has emphasized "joint force" operations for decades. Anyone in the military, regardless of branch, can be deployed wherever their training is applicable. While military regulations prohibit assigning anyone to a role in a combat zone for which they're not trained and qualified, the attachment of personnel from one branch of the service to units under the operational command of another branch is quite common.

Insofar has her being female, I really don't know what substantive difference that makes. During my tour of duty in Viet Nam, I never saw any job a guy was doing that a woman couldn't handle just as well. Not one. I think people get hung up on non-issues, issues like billeting, showering, latrines, etc. It seems strange to me that we've had coed college dorms for decades and people think its somehow a greater 'problem' in the military. Nonsense.

I personally don't think any of the 1740+ military deaths in Iraq is any more or less tragic and wasteful than any other, irrespective of age, gender, service branch, rank, etc. Indeed, I'm puzzled that anyone would think the death of an armed combat person would somehow be more tragic than that of an unarmed non-combat civilian. The entire thing is abominable.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
oldcoot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-27-05 12:18 PM
Response to Reply #15
20. You are correct
A human life is a human life. Whether or not that life belongs to a man or woman is irrelevant. Bush's incompetence has led too so much unnecessary sorrow.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Dec 27th 2024, 05:12 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC