|
<(the best example was Kerry and the swift boat liars; even if people didn't believe the charges they thought Kerry weak for not calling those guys out forcefully). >
Two Cases: Tang Accusations, SBVT Accusations
1)Who: Rather (CBS, 60 minutes)
What:Reports Bush problems in TANG - substantive information verified by multiple reputable sources, but a memo MAY be fake
Candidate Reaction: McClellan doesn't challenge memo prior to broadcast.
Other Media reaction: Outrage, discussions of irresponsibility
End Result: Long Time high quality professions fired, CBS apologies, the ENTIRE story disappears other than references to its unfairness and lack of truth
2) Who: O'Neil (a slimy Colson/Nixon operative) and Corsi (a rightwing nutcase who wrote disgusting things on Free Republic) and Admiral Hoffman (devised action that Kerry was in that was a disaster on all grounds)
What: Hundreds of self conflicting charges on Kerry's war and anti-war record. All contrary to official records
Candidate Reaction - when they first surfaced Kerry cited the Navy records, put 140 pages of them on his web site, noted that when he left VN they thought highly enough of him to make him an aide to an Admiral.
Media reaction: to give equal credence to SBVT EVEN those with obvious lies as to Kerry surrogates. Very little outrage.
End Result: The SBVT sold a lot of books, Corsi claims he'll run against Kerry for Senate, the media that DID NOT ask Hoffman or the others for any proof, demanded that Kerry after losing, sign to release all his military records TO CLEAR HIS NAME. When Kerry does and the records are the same as those that were on the web site (except a recommendation for accelerated promotion and a top fitness evaluation - which Kerry didn't have), most of the media ignored everything except Yale grades.
Conclusion: No matter what Kerry would have done the media would not have helped him. Note - Bush had something bad on his record, Kerry didn't, even now what % of people know this.
|