Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

My Gawds!! What has happened to AMERICAN WOMEN'S BODIES?????

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
Ripley Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-27-05 04:48 PM
Original message
My Gawds!! What has happened to AMERICAN WOMEN'S BODIES?????
My clothes dryer blew out it's motor this weekend. Oh the joy's of home ownership! Anyway, I had to take my laundry to the laundromat. While waiting on the machine, I picked up a "People" magazine. I admit, I have never read one in my life. Is this the same company that co-owns CNN now or something...their "People In the News" crap show on the weekends they used to do? Don't watch much TV anymore.

I was appalled by what I saw. I saw page after page, photo after photo of what I assume is considered the "beautiful, sexy, glamorous, to emulate" women of our time. One thing that stood out more than anything else was their bizarre bodies.

Freakily they all looked the same: way too big lips, fakey long hair, so much makeup you could do 100 clowns on their one application, and obviously enhanced breasts on tiny framed bodies and stick legs. Damn!

I felt like I was reading a zine about bad performance art. The female artists were all in some strange, unnatural totally revealing body suits and the male artists were all either of two looks: 1) normal body type, COVERED pretty much, so hard to tell if they had flat abs or not and 2) regular guys who were overweight, out of shape, perhaps balding, perhaps not attractive, perhaps naturally wrinkling and greying, perhaps too hairy, too squishy. Well you get the idea.

Except for Tom Cruise, who had an expose that should be in Blue Boy if it's not already. :eyes:

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
knowbody0 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-27-05 04:51 PM
Response to Original message
1. my three teenage daughters buy the magazines
but for some reason, wear no make up, and dress individually. i pinch myself, praying it is not a dream.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Endangered Specie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-27-05 06:25 PM
Response to Reply #1
41. Perhaps they are using it as a guide how not to look
:)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Maple Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-27-05 04:52 PM
Response to Original message
2. Starvation is 'in'
And of course plastic add-ons. Well, for women anyway.

Amazing that people can be 'stars' with fame and fortune galore, and yet emulate the famine of third world countries in the midst of plenty.

Kinda takes all the fun out of 'making it' don't you think?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ripley Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-27-05 04:59 PM
Response to Reply #2
6. By Jove, I think you've got it!
Edited on Mon Jun-27-05 05:00 PM by Ripley
Why can't a woman with the figure of say, Mia Hamm, 5'5" 125 lbs be considered sexy? Her athletic body would seem to be more desireable than the boobs on sticks.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Horse with no Name Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-27-05 06:52 PM
Response to Reply #6
56. Mia Hamm is uber sexy
Edited on Mon Jun-27-05 06:54 PM by Horse with no Name
Nomar Garciaparra is a lucky man.

I think women need to forget those magazines that promote anorexia and plastic surgery and look at the beautiful women in sports with healthy bodies.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NewJeffCT Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-27-05 07:02 PM
Response to Reply #6
66. I thought Mia Hamm was a sex symbol?
at least I thought she was?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
warrens Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-27-05 05:53 PM
Response to Reply #2
24. Spend some time in LA
It's unreal. They actually have ribs removed to look thinner. They all want to make it, and to do so, they clone the ones who have.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FreedomAngel82 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-27-05 06:39 PM
Response to Reply #2
47. They also
have all types of makeup artist's and a full staff of people to do their hair and clothes.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Sanity Claws Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-27-05 04:54 PM
Response to Original message
3. Yep, the ideal has now become bizarre.
And the odd thing is that Hollywood thinks that everyone else agrees with that standard of beauty.
You might want to check out awfulplasticsurgery.com for examples of really bad plastic surgery.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NashVegas Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-27-05 05:41 PM
Response to Reply #3
14. David Caruso On a Corn Stick
Edited on Mon Jun-27-05 05:42 PM by Crisco
I saw a promo for CSI Miami (no, I don't watch it) that had him front and center, looking like a space alien.

There was a comedian, I think it was the late Dennis Wolfberg, who said the key to being a celebrity was to have a large head on a tiny, tiny body. Reeks of anorexia.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ripley Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-27-05 05:50 PM
Response to Reply #14
20. HAH I agree!
Is that man supposed to be sexually appalling or appealing to women?

He is not at all attractive to me. He's actually a good actor, but you know what I mean. Imagine them taking the "Edgar-suit wife" woman from MIB to advertise that movie?

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FreedomAngel82 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-27-05 06:42 PM
Response to Reply #14
50. Yep
So many of them are thin. That's why I like people like Kelly Osbourne. She doesn't care about her clothing and things like that. She does her own thing and she is ragging about how some artist's look too thin. Lindsay Lohan is always getting people asking her if she's anorexia but she proclaims she isn't and eats a lot. I knew someone in high school who was a sorta friend who was like that. She could eat and eat and eat and never gain. In my senior year (She was a junior) she wanted to give blood but she was a lil underweight so she tried to gain a few more pounds by eating rolls and drinking whole milk but never gained.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
UdoKier Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-27-05 04:56 PM
Response to Original message
4. The gap has never been wider.
The women in magazines are more skeletal than ever, and the women (and men) you see on the street are fatter than ever, busting out of their hip-hugger jeans and half-shirts.

At least if 50's style dresses and skirts were in style, even meatier women could look good. Only very skinny girls look good in those hip-huggers, and even that's dubious, since you can see their damn hip bones protruding...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ripley Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-27-05 05:13 PM
Response to Reply #4
8. Is that satire?
Did I say women should wear 50's style dresses to cover their asses in order to look good?

At least you admit that seeing their bones protruding might not be such an attractive look.

To me there is a big difference between "People mag stars" who are extremely thin and regular looking women and obese women.

Why can't "People" cover people of all looks, instead of focusing on those who are a minority and often lie about themselves?

I hate to admit this, but I've seen Regis and Kelly because it is on at the gym in the morning. Kelly always complains she hates to exercise. She says she doesn't exercise. She claims she is lazy.

Bull fucking shit. I saw a picture of her demurely holding up her dress in that zine and her legs are toned. In a way that is not gotten by walking to one's limo.


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
UdoKier Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-27-05 05:22 PM
Response to Reply #8
10. I'm not quite sure what you're saying...
But I wouldn't mind a return to more modest clothing. Not corsets and curlers, but dresses were nice, IMO. How about Katherin Hepburn-style slacks & blouses? At least jeans that cover the hip bone. The low-slung look is really ugly, IMO. What's so bad about looking neat and attractive?

A lot of us men would also do well to opt for at least khaki trousers and a polo shirt, rather than the droopy-drawers/wifebeater and flip-flop look that's gotten so common these days...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ripley Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-27-05 05:44 PM
Response to Reply #10
16. Wifebeater has a "look?"
I think you are very mistaken with that comment.

I appreciate your other comments, but you do understand that saying guys with droopy-drawers are similar to wife beaters is not fact.

Wife beaters often wear suits and ties to work.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
catzies Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-27-05 05:49 PM
Response to Reply #16
19. He refers to the tanktop-style undershirt called a "wife-beater."
Hope that helps. It's a horrible term that has passed into the common vernacular; I'm sorry to say I knew what that was. Here's an example from a GIS for "wife beater shirt:"

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Goldmund Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-27-05 05:50 PM
Response to Reply #16
21. I think by "wife beater" he meant a sleaveless white shirt.
I don't like the hip-hop look he's describing, but the one look I hate more is the khaki trousers polo shirt dork look. :)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
UdoKier Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-27-05 06:02 PM
Response to Reply #21
30. Pesonally I like blue jeans and long-sleeve flannel shirts.
But a lot of places are too hot for that, so I tried for a less-sloppy option that would be okay in hotter climes.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
UdoKier Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-27-05 05:55 PM
Response to Reply #16
26. (sigh) "wife-beater" refers to a white tank top, not an actual person.
It's a common expression these days.

Sorry for the misunderstanding.


Typical wife-beater shirt.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ripley Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-27-05 06:08 PM
Response to Reply #26
32. WHAT?
A common expression these days is a guy wearing a white tank is a wife-beater.

:wtf:

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
UdoKier Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-27-05 06:10 PM
Response to Reply #32
33. The shirt is the wife-beater, not the guy.
I didn't make it up. The young hipsters did...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ripley Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-27-05 06:16 PM
Response to Reply #33
37. Heh.
Well, I see lots of guys wearing those type shirts and they aren't ANY WHERE NEAR WIFE BEATING.

So I missed the stereotype again.

Damn. Why do men take over these threads about how starved women are upheld as sex icons and change the thread to be more palatable...

and mention bad guys in white t shirts?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
UdoKier Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-27-05 06:33 PM
Response to Reply #37
43. Well, I agree with the comments RE starved models...
But I don't see that many scrawny girls around in real life. I dunno. I just don't look at those mags. My wife never has either. Don't see the attraction. It's always the same dumb quizzes and gossip and advice repackaged over and over.

Dove seems to have a new campaign going on to encourage appreciation of the beauty of real body types.

http://www.dove.co.uk/

http://www.dove.com/real_beauty/default.asp

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
smirkymonkey Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-27-05 07:06 PM
Response to Reply #43
69. They all have something in common, besides their skeletal
bodies - a dead, vacant look in thier eyes. It's like they've lost thier souls in the pursuit of perfection.

Personally, I find perfection boring - everybody is starting to look exactly alike.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CBHagman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-27-05 06:00 PM
Response to Reply #10
29. The low-slung look IS ugly.
Edited on Mon Jun-27-05 06:02 PM by CBHagman
It's a very hard look to carry off, even for someone who is slim. Less is more with that look -- i.e., a little flash of skin versus flesh that looks like it's being squeezed out of the jeans.

And don't tell me that you don't see flesh overlap every day. Unless you're among people who, for religious or weather reasons, don't wear skin-baring clothes, you know exactly what I mean.

What drives me out of my mind is that people are wearing clothes that accentuate a spare tire. All they have to do to look pulled together is wear clothing of a slightly different cut. They could strut their stuff with a low back or V-neck, for example, instead of the midriff-baring look.

On edit: Maybe I should amend my last remarks. One of my co-workers wears his shirts unbuttoned to the waist in summer. It's a little too "Hey, baby, what's your sign?" for the office. :-)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
alcibiades_mystery Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-27-05 07:11 PM
Response to Reply #10
70. Khaki trousers and a polo shirt
That's my cue to avoid a guy.

Yes, I'm an elitist, prejudiced dick. Sorry. The suburban marauder uniform makes me wanna hurl. Golf cap with that, Brad?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FreedomAngel82 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-27-05 06:46 PM
Response to Reply #8
53. Knowing her
she probably does walking and yoga and some gym stuff.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
getmeouttahere Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-27-05 06:49 PM
Response to Reply #8
54. Well, I don't care what the magazines try to sell us....
curvy is always sexier. And why are hip huggers sexy? You can't see the curve of a woman's butt that way...inf fact, their asses are coming out of those things

I enjoy seeing women in revealing clothes, but get some meat on your bones, ladies. This is why I don't think Cameron Diaz is sexy. No hips, no butt. It's void.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FreedomAngel82 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-27-05 06:44 PM
Response to Reply #4
52. That's one thing that pisses me off
Is the clothes. I mostly shop at Target and their brand Xhiliration has some really cute stuff though for all size's including jeans. I'm nothing skinny but I eat healthy and watch my weight and stuff. I'm just not too big on exercising as I should be, but if you go to the mall all their store's their really great clothes are all really small sizes and stuff. Sad, really.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
flamin lib Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-27-05 04:57 PM
Response to Original message
5. Know what ya' mean. Fan of classic 50's beauty here.
Round, soft, voluptuous. No anorexia for me, and when lips begin to need a cup size, well, I'm outta' here.

I'm married 35 years and have reached that uncomfortable point of not being attracted to those attracted to me and not being attractive to those attractive to me ;-). Still like the human form. Both sexes from an aesthetic point of view.

Probably more information than you wanted . . .
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
earth mom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-27-05 05:06 PM
Response to Original message
7. What gets me is the plastic surgery obsession...
Edited on Mon Jun-27-05 05:10 PM by TheGoldenRule
They all look like stepford wives or the living dead! Ever see these women close up? Yikes-it's scary! I used to live in Southern California and went back a few years ago and was struck (guess I didn't notice it when I used to live there or maybe there are just tons more of em now) by how their plastic faces are so unnatural. The worst are the older women who look absolutely hideous with their pasty complexions, odd puffy cheekbones and eyes that never seem to close.

If I didn't know better I could have sworn they had been made up at the funeral home... :scared:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Disturbed Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-27-05 05:20 PM
Response to Reply #7
9. Just curious.
Anybody have proof that Laura Bush has had cosmetic surgery?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FreedomAngel82 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-27-05 06:53 PM
Response to Reply #9
57. Here's two photo's of Laura to compare and contrast
Here she is in 1999:



Here she is now in 2005:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FreedomAngel82 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-27-05 06:50 PM
Response to Reply #7
55. Really
Edited on Mon Jun-27-05 06:51 PM by FreedomAngel82
I remember reading a good while back an interview with Kelly Osbourne. She and her family were moving back to London (at least she was) and she was telling how she likes London a lot better than California because basically everybody in California is real fake or tries to be like celebrties and everybody wants to make it etc. Nobody is real anymore. She made some really good points. I've never been to London or California personally though. But I could see what she means.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tishaLA Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-27-05 09:24 PM
Response to Reply #55
85. You could see what she means?
And you've never been here. Heard of stereotypes? Did you ever think that maybe the reason Kelly Osbourne is around a lot of fake people who try to be like celebs is because *she* is, in fact, a celebrity who, truth be told, wouldn't be anywhere without her father and her mother, who has had two face lifts, stomach reduction surgery, liposuction, colors her hair different colors all the time, and has a makeup artist to fix her face before she appears in public.

And that Kelly Osbourne talked about how fake people in California are? Some of us here in Los Angeles are not nearly as shallow and stupid as she is. And we don't have to go to rehab for Oxycontin addiction like she did either.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
getmeouttahere Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-27-05 06:55 PM
Response to Reply #7
58. I don't spend a lot of time in Beverly Hills....
but I don't see a lot of what you people are talking about in Santa Monica, on 3rd St. Promenade, I see a mix of body types...I think we're feeding a SoCal stereotype here....very few women look like the movie/tv stars, even here in L.A.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SoCalDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-27-05 05:27 PM
Response to Original message
11. Woman... as designed by a collaboration between
Salvadore Dali....Picasso....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LibDemAlways Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-27-05 05:36 PM
Response to Original message
12. I live in So. Cal. and at least half of all
the younger women in my corner of suburbia are size 2 and have big, fake boobs but nothing between the earlobes. I truly live in Stepford.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
noiretextatique Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-27-05 05:40 PM
Response to Original message
13. it's the SOS, different day, isn't it?
the "ideal" never remotely approaches what real women look like.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SoCalDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-27-05 05:42 PM
Response to Reply #13
15. 1940's-50's women came the closest to reality
but not since:(
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
noiretextatique Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-27-05 05:44 PM
Response to Reply #15
17. weren't they griddled and harnessed though?
Edited on Mon Jun-27-05 05:45 PM by noiretblu
but i do recall my size 14 grandmother was quite the hottie back then :7

the SOS: women just can't be natural and be normal. there's gotta be paint or laquer or girdles or implants or something. my particular dislike: colored contacts. i haven't seen many the look real on the women i know who wear them...they look like aliens.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SoCalDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-27-05 05:51 PM
Response to Reply #17
22. When they "gussied up", but most ordinary women
wore slacks and shorts at home, and comfy shoes and didn't even wear makeup:)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
noiretextatique Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-27-05 06:13 PM
Response to Reply #22
35. thanks...i was born in 1958
so, admittedly, i don't have much knowledge about that time.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
XemaSab Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-27-05 05:45 PM
Response to Reply #15
18. Marilyn Monroe
was a size 14.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SoCalDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-27-05 05:59 PM
Response to Reply #18
28. Yeppers.. I would love to see the looks on the faces of today's
Edited on Mon Jun-27-05 06:00 PM by SoCalDem
size 2's when they order a vintage dress:).. First of all there were NO size 2's..

Most size runs started at 5-6, and during the 60's , junior petite came into vogue with a size 3..

measurements were different too.. (from the 60's)

size 8....30-22-32

size 10...32-24-32

size 12...34-24/25-34

remember 36-26-36 ?? Size 14

size 16....38-28-38

size 18 was 38/40-30-38/40

Today's size 2's would find that a size 10 might fit them or might be too small.. remember those TIGHT skirts with the teensy NON-elasticized waistbands:)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ripley Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-27-05 06:12 PM
Response to Reply #28
34. Thanks for putting it in numbers!
It is so obvious they are trying to kill and eat women. Those who like chicken wings for a meal.

Just kidding. ;)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
phylny Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-27-05 10:11 PM
Response to Reply #28
92. My mother used to say that the reason American women got so fat
compared to women in her day was because of elastic. Back then (as you said), the waistbands of skirts and slacks (not pants, but slacks ;)) had no elastic.

I'm on weight watchers now, and I vow that once I get to my goal weight, I will never wear elastic waistbands again! :)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cleita Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-27-05 06:37 PM
Response to Reply #18
45. If you get a chance, get a copy of "Some Like It Hot". Marilyn Monroe
looks downright fat by today's standards although she seems to be thinner in later movies. It could be a reason for her problems with prescription drugs. Anyway it's a hilarious movie with Jack Lennon and Tony Curtis cross dressing to escape the mob.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SoCalDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-27-05 06:39 PM
Response to Reply #45
48. Amphetamines were handed out like candy in those days
uppers, and cigarettes were the "diet" of the day:(..

Jusy Garland was given them when she was dancing on the yellow brick road.. (she was maturing too fast..they also bound her so she would look jevenile)..No wonder so many actresses of their era has "issues".
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cleita Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-27-05 06:40 PM
Response to Reply #45
49. If you watch "Desperate Housewives" I think
Wisteria Lane should be renamed Anorexia Lane. The women are way too thin with the exception of Nicolette Sheridan.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
expatriate Donating Member (853 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-27-05 09:38 PM
Response to Reply #18
86. in fact, 14 was her "in-between" size!
Monroe varied between a size 12 and an 18. For most of her films, she was a 14, sometimes with the help of body shaping garments. She was very fond of food. Some of her drug related problems were due to the use of amphetamines to lose weight quickly when she was due to start a film. Judy Garland had similar problems - naturally plump, she was put on amphetamines as a youngster to keep her weight down for filming - and her problems grew from there.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kskiska Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-27-05 09:52 PM
Response to Reply #18
87. Marilyn was NOT fat, and certainly not today's size 14
Edited on Mon Jun-27-05 10:10 PM by kskiska
If so, she'd have looked more like Anna Nicole Smith.





Snopes.com covers it:
http://www.snopes.com/movies/actors/mmdress.htm

Dress sizes were different then.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SoCalDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-27-05 10:04 PM
Response to Reply #87
90. Clothing sizes were different back then..
and yes..she WAS a "plus size" by today's standards :)

Society changed..and not for the better..

There was a time when juveniles were expected to actually grow up and become adults..

The desire today (started in the 60's really) is for people (especially women) to remain "barely legal" and to LOOK just barely pubescent..

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
XemaSab Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-28-05 10:06 AM
Response to Reply #87
93. Compared with most of today's actresses
Edited on Tue Jun-28-05 10:09 AM by XemaSab
she's plump.

Look at her butt in that photo, and the undersides of her arms. She's even got a slightly poochy tummy.

She'd never make it today.

Height: 5 feet, 5½ inches
Weight: 118-140 pounds
Bust: 35-37 inches
Waist: 22-23 inches
Hips: 35-36 inches
Bra size: 36D

Uh.... 5'5" and 140?




Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NYCGirl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-27-05 10:11 PM
Response to Reply #18
91. Snopes has something to say about that:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
greekspeak Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-27-05 05:51 PM
Response to Original message
23. The last time I made the mistake of picking up People I rued doing so
I saw it there...right next to me on the stairmaster. And so I read it. For about 3 minutes. Page after Page after page of ecentrically dressed celebrities with catty comments from a "panel of fashion experts." One comment was to the effect that Shirley McClaine's outfit was reminiscent of a grape so she should be stepped on. Another commented on how she looked like an escapee from an "old folk's home." It is always nice to know that no matter how rotten life in Shrub's America gets for everyone, we can all still be fashion conscious. :eyes:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KT2000 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-27-05 05:53 PM
Response to Original message
25. Look at the ingenues in movies
they have emaciated faces and stick arms and legs. Did you know they actually make a size zero now in women's clothing.
I guess the goal is to disappear.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wideopen Donating Member (563 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-27-05 05:56 PM
Response to Original message
27. I'll take a REAL woman.
No plastic , no bones sticking out, just a real woman with real curves. I find women that try to hard to be a complete turn off and the ones that their heads look to big for their bodies- just eewwww. I hope the days of voluptuous women come back soon.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SoCalDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-27-05 06:06 PM
Response to Reply #27
31. You can always find us
Edited on Mon Jun-27-05 06:09 PM by SoCalDem
We never went away, the powers-that-be just started telling us we were too ugly to be on tv or in the magazines, once our weight exceeded our IQs:)

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
stevans_41902 Donating Member (199 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-27-05 06:15 PM
Response to Reply #31
36. They have not only a size 0 jeans but a size 00.
I absolutely hate it because i know so many girls my age who wear a size 3-5 and they are constantly complaining about how they are SO fat and need to lose weight. There are so many on campus who look like they haven't eaten in weeks, its so disgusting. I see nothing wrong with working out and being toned but i hate the size 0 huge boobs look that seems to be 'in' these days.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SoCalDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-27-05 06:18 PM
Response to Reply #36
38. Just for kicks.. order a pair of OLD school jeans (or a dress) from ebay
Edited on Mon Jun-27-05 06:19 PM by SoCalDem
circa 1965...about a size 10... I bet they'll be too big for it:) They need to be told that sizes have been manipulated.. Even back then, couture or designer duds were always sized down to "flatter m'lady".. A rich woman would special order her clothing in a size 8, but the measurements suited an off-the-rack size 12. :) It's called marketing :)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SoCalDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-27-05 06:20 PM
Response to Reply #36
39. Subcutaneous cereal bowls
:)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
getmeouttahere Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-27-05 07:02 PM
Response to Reply #36
65. All this tells me that men.....
are telling them they are fat AND that there are enough men out there that think skeletons with skin are sexy
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Trajan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-27-05 09:59 PM
Response to Reply #65
89. I think you are painting far too broad a picture ...
Here on this thread: nearly EVERY male, to the last one, has found the uberthin look unappetizing, and expressed a preference for a more filled out figure ...

Yet you ignore this lopsided population segment, and come to the opposite conclusion ....

Hmmmmmmmm ....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Endangered Specie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-27-05 06:24 PM
Response to Original message
40. Forget that shit... I like women with some weight on them
This uber skinny thing is disgusting... ribcages are a turn off, I dont know how guys can be attracted to someone that looks like you could break her if you squeezed hard enough.

and as far as the makeup thing goes... go easy on that stuff, it might add extra pounds :sarcasm:

and lastly, I cant stand bleach blond dyed hair :thumbsdown:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nonconformist Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-27-05 06:29 PM
Response to Original message
42. Cue the thin bashers. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
progressivebydesign Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-27-05 06:37 PM
Response to Reply #42
46. You're joking.. right?
Or you are extremely self-defensive. this is not about bashing thin people or anyone being jealous. It's about an unhealthy body image that is being force-fed into our daughters.. do you have problem with that???
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nonconformist Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-27-05 06:44 PM
Response to Reply #46
51. No, not joking.
Your post below bashes people with small upper-arms then later assumes they're anorexic, which is a mental disorder.

I'm not defending the body image issue, and I'm certainly not defending self-mutilation in the form of plastic surgery. But some people ARE naturally thin and very small boned.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
noiretextatique Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-27-05 07:00 PM
Response to Reply #51
63. surely, not every one who is that small
Edited on Mon Jun-27-05 07:02 PM by noiretblu
is that way naturally, espeically those deemed "celebrities." you'd have to live in a bubble to really buy that. no meant offense to naturally small people, btw.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nonconformist Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-27-05 07:01 PM
Response to Reply #63
64. Never said everyone. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bicentennial_baby Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-27-05 07:05 PM
Response to Reply #51
67. thank you
I get enough of this from my mom and grandma... I've never had an eating disorder and I'm very small...no effort involved.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bicentennial_baby Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-27-05 06:57 PM
Response to Reply #42
60. Yep
Apparently I'm not a REAL woman with my size 1-2 ass...sigh.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nonconformist Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-27-05 06:59 PM
Response to Reply #60
61. delete
Edited on Mon Jun-27-05 07:00 PM by nonconformist
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
progressivebydesign Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-27-05 06:35 PM
Response to Original message
44. It's shocking. The "beautiful" people are starving themselves.
Upper arms should not be 8 inches around.. nor should thighs. I'm not sure WHO the fuck decided that female beauty should be about losing everything that makes a female look like a female. I've always been around a size 6/8, and these women make me look overweight in comparison. I just received a recent Victoria's Secret catalog (which I stopped buying from a few years ago in protest of their exaggerated body images), anyhoo.. you can't even look at lingerie or swimwear in there because the noxious, starved, implanted, contorted, bodies on the women. It's distracting to see them. Sometimes if you put your thumb over the head, it could substitute for a public service about starvation in other countries.

It's sick... I have a running gag going with my teen stepdaughter.. when we happen to watch tv together (we rarely watch tv), we joke about how only ultra-thin, beautiful, fashion models apparently wash clothes, shop for food, drive cars, etc., every single ad has a supermodel thin woman touting something. Apparently there is no other female in America than 20-something-anorexic-thin-collagen -lipped straight haired ones according to Madison Avenue and Hollywood.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bicentennial_baby Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-27-05 07:00 PM
Response to Reply #44
62. My upper arm is 7.75 inches around...
and I eat like a horse...gotta problem with that?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
getmeouttahere Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-27-05 07:11 PM
Response to Reply #62
71. not at all, if you're healthy it shouldn't matter....
some of these folks are just saying that your body type shouldn't be an ideal that every girl/women has to live up to
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bicentennial_baby Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-27-05 07:18 PM
Response to Reply #71
73. i agree with that
it's just that these conversations often devolve into a trashfest of anyone who's thin, naturally or not. it bugs me, b/c i've heard it for years, and i just want to be accepted as i am, skinny ass and all.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
noiretextatique Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-27-05 07:26 PM
Response to Reply #73
74. i understand your concern
however, you can't deny that some of these so-called celebraties are starving themselves to fit into the image du jour. i have no problem with thin people, in general...used to be one myself :7
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bicentennial_baby Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-27-05 07:28 PM
Response to Reply #74
75. oh definitely
especially someone like Lara Flynn Boyle, who looks downright skeletal! It's sad, and an unfortunate reflection of how our society values women. I try to have a thicker skin about some things, but this is one that gets me sometimes... :)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
noiretextatique Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-27-05 07:43 PM
Response to Reply #75
77. i can understand that
:grouphug: i am concerned about my niece who is just barely 5 feet tall, slender, and terribly dimpled :7 i can only imagine how many times she will have to endure head pats and condescending comments while working towards her science degree. luckily...she has quite a fighting spirit. too bad she got kicked off her varsity basketball team because of her height...she was the best player, hands down.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
getmeouttahere Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-27-05 07:05 PM
Response to Reply #44
68. This is why I like watching the spanish-language channels...
every now and then...almost all the women are healthy looking....really, really healthy looking...check it out sometime
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Misunderestimator Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-27-05 06:56 PM
Response to Original message
59. LOL@Doing 100 clowns with the makeup!
:rofl:

IMO... The look you describe is exceedingly unattractive... The only explanation I can come up with is ... misogynistic men run the fashion industry... Could that be? hmmmmmmmmmmmmm :shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
smirkymonkey Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-27-05 07:12 PM
Response to Reply #59
72. Ding, ding, ding
You win the prize!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KoKo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-27-05 07:29 PM
Response to Original message
76. Most of American Females are classified as "overwheight" on the Health
Insurance charts. And Target/Walmart, etc. and others are gearing up the really "neat" clothing to the "ample," "full figured" and "just a whole lotta love American Woman."

The Designers know that folks in the over Size 24 Crowd want to look GOOD...Look Sexy and Opulent.

It's the NEW AMERICAN CULTURE..get with it or BUSH WILL MARK YOU. :shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ripley Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-27-05 08:24 PM
Response to Reply #76
78. I give kudos to Dove..I'm seeing ads with REAL women.
Why has it taken so long?

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Book Lover Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-27-05 08:30 PM
Response to Original message
79. No one is saying you *have to* look like that
The most important words a person can learn are "fuck you." Embrace them. If you feel like this bullshit is aimed at you, throw back a good hearty "fuck you" at it, and you'll feel better.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ripley Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-27-05 08:49 PM
Response to Reply #79
80. Hello, yeah I know how to say that.
Are you confusing me with someone else?

Been there. Done that. That would be part of the "fuck you" thing.




Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Book Lover Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-27-05 08:51 PM
Response to Reply #80
81. No
I responded to your post with my opinion. Sorry if it was not up to your bar.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ripley Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-27-05 08:54 PM
Response to Reply #81
82. Oh, my bar.
What the hell is my bar?

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Book Lover Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-27-05 09:00 PM
Response to Reply #82
83. I'm not sure what I said that so pissed you off
so rather than going through a dozen posts of back and forth, let's just end this now. If you want to complain about what you see in People magazine, fine, whatever. If you're not interested in my two cents, again, whatever. Welcome to my ignore list.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AX10 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-27-05 09:06 PM
Response to Original message
84. The women I see in the magazines are ugly.
They have no shape to them whatsoever.

It's very sad to see this crap being sold to our children
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Nikia Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-27-05 09:55 PM
Response to Original message
88. I am in an eating disorder support group
At our last meeting, we talked about body image. Most of the young woman have had the experience of hearing others, especially men, talk about how attractive the thin women are. All of the women in my group have one thing in common, we are perfectionists. We found that we could be thin too by controlling our bodies. Listening to them talk, I sometimes wonder why there aren't more young women with eating disorders. In short, our culture pushes us to achievement. An achievement for women is to be thin. Is it suprising that some of us get carried away with it?
I realize my problem. I look at myself naked in the mirror. On one hand, I see my ribs and hip bones sticking out and know that I have to gain weight. On the otherhand, I see my fat stomach and upper thighs. This is how I am gentically. If I only had 10 pounds of fat on my whole body, 8 1/2 of it would be in those areas. I cannot be perfect. At my current weight, I will be both too skinny and fat to wear a bikini according to standards of perfection. Perhaps, being perfect is overrated. Being healthy is not.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Dec 27th 2024, 05:10 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC