Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

The Next Terror Attack on US Soil

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
Beetwasher Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-24-03 11:46 AM
Original message
The Next Terror Attack on US Soil
Edited on Wed Sep-24-03 11:46 AM by Beetwasher
Will be touted as a great success of US policy because we're "bringing the terrorists out in the open! When they launch a suicide attack it accomplish two of our goals 1. The terrorists die, so we're getting rid of them and 2. It flushes them out of their holes and exposes their network"

Just you watch, you heard it here first. I'm not saying this spin will work, but I can just hear them saying this...

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Minstrel Boy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-24-03 11:52 AM
Response to Original message
1. Didn't Rummy admit to the strategy of
actually provoking attacks in order to flush them out?

"Are people gonna die? You bet."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
gkdmaths Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-24-03 11:53 AM
Response to Original message
2. I can hear the
gov't voices over the louspeakers now:

...All civilians must remain still untill all of the terrorists have blown themselves up...together we will win the war on terrorism..."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
gristy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-24-03 11:57 AM
Response to Original message
3. Huh?
Any terror attack on U.S. soil is going to hurt bush. Look at what you've written. It's just silly. Fresh air and a walk might help.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Beetwasher Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-24-03 12:00 PM
Response to Reply #3
5. Sigh. Did I say it wouldn't be bad for Bush?
Re-read what I wrote...I'm just predicting the spin, not qualifying it...Reading comprehension 101 might help...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
gristy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-24-03 12:23 PM
Response to Reply #5
10. OK, I'll be more clear
Any attempt at the type of spin you suggest will also be bad for bush.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Beetwasher Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-24-03 12:29 PM
Response to Reply #10
12. Doesn't mean they won't try...
Edited on Wed Sep-24-03 12:36 PM by Beetwasher
They've been doing lot's of idiotic stuff lately that's bad for Bush...Does "There's no link between SH and 9/11 and we never said there was" ring a bell? How about "It's only 16 words"? I'm just calling it as I see it.

"Any terror attack on U.S. soil is going to hurt bush."

That says nothing about the spin and that was your original comment. It had nothing to do with you not being clear enough. If you want to backtrack and change your position to you think the spin will be bad for Bush, fine, but that's not what you said or meant originally. You need to lighten up Chester and stop being condescending.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
paradisiac Donating Member (104 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-24-03 11:59 AM
Response to Original message
4. I think it would backfire
on them in a major way. I think the window of opportunity for that type of spurious rationalization is slowly but surely closing.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
newyawker99 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-24-03 01:00 PM
Response to Reply #4
13. Hi paradisiac!!
Welcome to DU!! :toast:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DoYouEverWonder Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-24-03 12:08 PM
Response to Original message
6. Yesterday at the UN
W listed about 10 different major terrorist attacks that have taken place since 9-11. Seems like his war or terror is a huge success. We've gone from one major terrorist attack every couple of years to at least 5 per year. Way to go W.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Don_G Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-24-03 12:11 PM
Response to Reply #6
7. And They (ShrubCo) Said It Couldn't Be Done
<sarcasm off>
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Clete Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-24-03 12:13 PM
Response to Original message
8. You forgot that it will raise Adolf Bush's popularity
again by making him look like a hero. It also puts citizens in the right state of terror and fear that enables those in power to gain even more power at the expense of our liberty. I often wondered why Israelis keep electing Sharon. This is the reason why. God help us.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
forgethell Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-24-03 12:17 PM
Response to Original message
9. Nope
it will lead to a call for ethnic profiling, unless they can get a blond Irish convert to Islam to conduct the terrorist act. It will lead to a greater rollback of limits on criminal procedures. And it will lead to a big surge in GWB's popularity as the sheeple flock to the man who "will protect them"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
boxster Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-24-03 12:27 PM
Response to Original message
11. Too funny
And probably dead-on accurate. I can't believe the stuff that comes out of people in this administration.

These are the same people who are now telling us there was no link between 9/11 & Saddam and telling us it was never about getting rid of Saddam, even though we have a $25 million bounty on his head.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Dec 27th 2024, 03:43 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC