Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Cockpit security rant-9/11 should not have happened.

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
trof Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-24-03 04:02 PM
Original message
Cockpit security rant-9/11 should not have happened.
Edited on Wed Sep-24-03 04:27 PM by trof
"Testifying before the House Interstate and Foreign Commerce Committee in 1969, Charles Ruby (then president of the Air Line Pilots' Association) said that ALPA, along with airline industry and government agencies, had pressed for research and development of "satisfactory equipment capable of solving the hijacking problem, either by detecting weapons or other devices used by hijackers prior to their boarding an aircraft or disarming hijackers in flight. Several techniques and devices have been considered, including X-ray, radar, magnetometers, bulletproof protection, more effective cockpit door locks, and…a means of surveying the passenger compartment by pilots."

"ALPA’s leaders aren’t the only ones who took note of the union’s calls for fortified cockpits and other security improvements. In October 2001, Chicago Tribune columnist Bob Greene, in a column headlined "Don’t say that we weren’t forewarned," cited a 1970 letter from Ruby to the FAA asking for a bulletproof cockpit with electromagnetic locks and a sliding panel in the cockpit doors so pilots could use defensive devices."
https://www.alpa.org/alpa/DesktopModules/ViewDocument.aspx?DocumentID=400

Isn't it sad that if these requests had been given serious consideration and study the World Trade Towers would still be standing? It's still the same old story, that of bottom line for the airlines and the government not wanting to assume the financial responsibilities for security. It's been going on for over 40 years.

There's an old saying in aviation that nothing will be changed until you kill enough people.
I guess we've finally killed enough people.
:-(
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
trof Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-24-03 04:27 PM
Response to Original message
1. kick
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Solomon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-24-03 04:59 PM
Response to Original message
2. I still don't believe it was done
with boxcutters. How come one of them boxcutters didn't float outta the sky like that clean passport did?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RoeBear Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-24-03 05:02 PM
Response to Original message
3. You gotta be kidding me...
...the doors were opened because the terrorists were slitting stewardesses throats! What the fuck good would any of the items mentioned have done (possible exception: better detecting of weapons on the ground)? There is only one thing that could have stopped the terrorists and that's arming the flight crew.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
trof Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-24-03 05:11 PM
Response to Reply #3
4. nope
Edited on Wed Sep-24-03 05:12 PM by trof
With the secure cockpit comes the understanding that the door does not open. You may land with the back end full of corpses, but you don't turn into a flying bomb.

on edit-sorry, you don't know me. I was an airline pilot for 30+ years. I know a little bit about this stuff.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Solomon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-24-03 05:19 PM
Response to Reply #4
5. Now that's a point you can't argue
with. :smoke:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Dec 27th 2024, 04:10 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC