Who's betting the terrorists are from Iran?

[linazelle]

Can't you just see Rumsfeld running around right now telling them to find a link between Iran and the London bombings? How long before we see 19 Iranian faces all caught by our capable intelligence people?

[pstans]

1. Count me in

Iran was the first thing that I thought of after I heard of the new.

Well after thinking about the people that got hurt in the blasts, of course.

[bryant69]

2. I doubt it

It's possible, I won't deny that, but it would surprise me. Because whatever bounce Bush gets from todays attacks it doesn't adress the underlying problem; we don't have the troops to do both Iran and Iraq at the same time.

Bryant
Check it out --> http://politicalcomment.blogspot.com

[RaleighNCDUer]

13. Of course we don't.

Which is why they need the program of whipping up anti-Iran ferver before there is a similar, or worse, attack at home which would justify a draft.

[Hubert Flottz]

3. They will shape the "Truth" again and again!

To work for the PNAC program!

[1956]

7. you got it!

PNAC is what they're promoting!!

[Hubert Flottz]

21. Welcome to DU 1956!

We need all the help we can get!

[The_Casual_Observer]

4. The memo probably says "Go Massive!"

[1956]

5. absolutely!

SO predictable! I think this is what all of us have been fearing ever since we began connecting the shady little dots!!!

[in_cog_ni_to]

6. That's what they'll say, but

I'm not buying it.

[goodboy]

8. our 'capable' intelligence people had NO FUCKING CLUE this was

going to happen.

U.S. Gov't: No Evidence of Planned Attacks


Thursday July 7, 2005 4:01 PM

AP Photo WX102


http://www.guardian.co.uk/worldlatest/story/0,1280,-5125081,00.html

[1956]

11. I've become so cynical

That I'm not buying that either.

[Hubert Flottz]

16. They were too busy seeing what you checked out at the library...

to connect the dots.

[goodboy]

25. ain't that the truth. Tell me, how did our libary records help prevent

this terrattack on London you fucks!?!?!

[Clark2008]

9. Or Syria

[mtnester]

10. Irrelevant....they will end up being from Iran if GW wants them to be

whether they actually were or not is moot, YOU know that (HEAVY :sarcasm:)

---apologies to everyone today for my smart assiness throughout the threads today....this is a horrible day for many families, and it seems my sadness has made me even more bitter toward our shitty president than I ever thought I could be. I THOUGHT I was as bitter as the next gal...I found out today I could go deeper into the bitter well, and that then pissed me off more....and then the snowball started moving...well, I am living a vicious anger cycle today.

[1956]

15. I feel the same way!

DRUNKEN FRAT BOY DRIVES COUNTRY INTO DITCH!
( a bumpersticker I love)
This is a real sad day, and I really fear what the terrorist in the WH and UK will come up with!! But I think I already know!!!

[distantearlywarning]

12. I was thinking Venezuela.

This definitely looked like a Venezuelan job to me.

[Pachamama]

14. You mean that they are "reported" to be from Iran? Yep...

I say that this is what will be coming soon from our incredibly accurate intelligence from the truthful people who tell it.... :eyes:

[1956]

19. Wasn't it reported that

N Korea was helping Iran with Nuclear weapons? If so, how stupid would it be to invade a country that really did have something they could use against us!!! Maybe I'm totally misinformed!

[XemaSab]

17. I'm betting they're Saudis

but we'll be told that they're Syrian.

Just a hunch.

[ugarte]

18. Most likely the new President of Iran directed the attack personally

nt

[1956]

20. I guess we'll soon find out

But how will we possibly be able to invade again? We're already so short troopwise? PLEASE DON"T SAY THE D word! I can't imagine even some of the red staters puttin' up with that BS!!

[Love Bug]

22. If they're not they soon will be

[stickdog]

23. No, they'll be from Saudi Arabia again. We'll just ATTACK Iran for revenge

[linazelle]

27. This is true. You've got this thing down pat. n/t

[CarlosNH]

24. I was just thinking

the same thing. How long before the bombings are "linked" to Iran or Syria?

[Psyop Samurai]

26. Anyone have Michael Ledeen's phone #?

Instead of waiting around for the media plants to kick in, why don't we just call and find out who we're supposed to attack?

[DWolper]

28. They may very well be...

We should also consider the possibility that these terrorist operatives could very well have connections with Iran. I don't understand all the passes given by some here at DU to the most socially conservative, extremist government on the planet: IRAN. They very well could be financing terrorism. Why that could be greeted with such skepticism here is odd to me. They are a fanatical fascist regime.

[linazelle]

29. Anything is possible...the likelihood of the terrorists coming from

the very place that BushCo has been drumming up excuses to invade is very low. Just like it was non-existent with Saddam/911.

Why people like you find it easy to believe things that BushCo says when it's proven that they lie over and over again is beyond me.

I guess we'll never understand each other huh? :shrug: