Did anyone else detect a sense of glee or satisfaction in Bush's

[Prodemsouth]

voice as he was making his comments on the terrorist violence in London? I did not hear anger or outrage over the attacks in his voice.

[Vincardog]

1. That is how death cult leaders act. aWoL is evil.

[jobycom]

2. Bush always perks up when he gets an excuse to kill people.

[Joe the Revelator]

3. Nm

read the post wrong. sorry.

[bigtree]

4. He's anticipating the opportunity for another rubble and bullhorn moment

[alarimer]

5. It wouldn't surprise me

Incidents like this keep the populace cowed and afraid and allow the war on "terra" free reign. His ratings will go up- just watch. Even though,to me, this indicates that the war on "terra" is a collosal failure. How can it be a success if there continue to be attacks??

[The Velveteen Ocelot]

6. I think he gets a kick out of violence.

And he's probably imagining how this gives him an excuse to amp up the War on Terra and kill more "folks."

[whatever4]

7. First I had to learn how to spell fascism

with this government. It wasn't a word I used frequently before. Now I have to learn how to spell sociopathic. I'll never get that one right.

[lebkuchen]

8. You're assuming the Chimp has a central nervous system

despite all evidence to the contrary.

[pauldp]

9. F*ck the Fratboy Death Cult. n/t

[Prodemsouth]

13. My only hope is that people in Europe are paying attention to

his delivery of these comments and that it causes a large enough uproar to be noticed back here at home. Bush and Terrorist seem to benefit each other.

[stickdog]

10. What did you expect from our Giddy Executioner?

He always reacts to human tragedy like a violent video game addict.

[fob]

11. Here's my take. I turned on the radio and out poured bush*s voice

talking about "those people who kill and that's the difference between us and them" :eyes: and blah blah blah. It was his exact same campaign speech peppered with the ums and uhs we've all come to expect from little boots*.

Here's the kicker, I had no idea about the London bombings until AFTER bush* is done with his speech and Springer announced that was, "an obviously emotional bush* talking about the bombings in London". I did a double take and listened for more details and as the gravity of the situation became clearer, the disinterest in bush*s voice in his* "emotional" speech grew even more striking. I'm pretty sure given access to speech archives of the little fucker one could have grabbed the exact same speech from any one of a dozen times prior to today and played it and there would be no discernible difference. He* put no more effort/energy into that speech than he* does into anything he* does, that is NOT MUCH.

[leftinbluestate]

12. No, I didn't

See any hint of outrage--nor did I see any 'glee' or 'satisfaction' either.

[Prodemsouth]

15. Are you saying he seemed not to care.? That is what sticks out at

me. It had a very unusal sound- (I worked in professional voice development) given wwhat had happened.

[leftinbluestate]

16. No, he's just being his usual self

I don't see anything different from the norm. I can tell when a person is putting it on. He acted no different than the other leaders did when interviewed. Politicians call it the classic poker face.
I'll be watching more later an will get back to you.

[elehhhhna]

14. At least he kept a straight face for a change.