|
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend Bookmark this thread |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) |
TheBlob (805 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Sep-25-03 01:36 PM Original message |
Were Clinton's numbers ever this bad? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
wyldwolf (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Sep-25-03 01:38 PM Response to Original message |
1. Worse... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Langis (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Sep-25-03 01:39 PM Response to Reply #1 |
3. What was going on around that time? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
TheBlob (805 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Sep-25-03 01:40 PM Response to Reply #1 |
4. That's not worse than some of these mid-40's ratings |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
wyldwolf (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Sep-25-03 01:43 PM Response to Reply #4 |
6. That's so... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Zero Gravitas (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Sep-25-03 01:57 PM Response to Reply #1 |
13. Yes, but |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Langis (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Sep-25-03 01:38 PM Response to Original message |
2. I don't think they were ever this bad |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
59millionmorons (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Sep-25-03 01:41 PM Response to Original message |
5. Yes |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
fertilizeonarbusto (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Sep-25-03 01:44 PM Response to Reply #5 |
8. And rightly so |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Skinner ADMIN (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Sep-25-03 01:44 PM Response to Original message |
7. I'm pretty sure his numbers were much worse. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
FlaGranny (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Sep-25-03 02:34 PM Response to Reply #7 |
15. I believe that Clinton |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Nederland (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Sep-25-03 01:45 PM Response to Original message |
9. Yes |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
West Coast Democrat (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Sep-25-03 03:01 PM Response to Reply #9 |
18. Those are not Job Approval Numbers, Nederland |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
JaneQPublic (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Sep-25-03 03:04 PM Response to Reply #9 |
19. Those are Favorability ratings, not Job Approval ratings |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
sventvkg (448 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Sep-25-03 01:49 PM Response to Original message |
10. DAMN I miss Clinton..I'm embarrassed to be American with Smirky leading |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
nothingshocksmeanymore (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Sep-25-03 01:52 PM Response to Original message |
11. Clinton's approval rating sunk as low as 38% at one point in 94 |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DemocratSinceBirth (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Sep-25-03 01:54 PM Response to Reply #11 |
12. Cuz The Economy Was Smoking |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Freddie Stubbs (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Sep-25-03 02:05 PM Response to Original message |
14. Reagan's numbers were lower at this time in his 1st term |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
59millionmorons (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Sep-25-03 02:51 PM Response to Reply #14 |
16. the difference is |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Timefortruth (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Sep-25-03 02:57 PM Response to Original message |
17. Look at this |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
CMT (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Sep-25-03 03:06 PM Response to Original message |
20. he was in the 30's |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
West Coast Democrat (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Sep-25-03 03:08 PM Response to Reply #20 |
21. If not for 9-11, Chimpy's #s would have been in the 30s.............. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) | Fri Dec 27th 2024, 03:31 AM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC