I found this article from a British newspaper. Can anyone from across the pond tell me how reliable this newspaper, the Evening Standard, is?
http://www.thisislondon.co.uk/news/londonnews/articles/10329634?source=Evening%20Standard"As far as I'm concerned, when they bomb London, the bigger the better," says Abdul Haq, the social worker. "I know it's going to happen because Sheikh bin Laden said so. Like Bali, like Turkey, like Madrid - I pray for it, I look forward to the day."
"I agree with you, brother," says Abu Yusuf, the earnest-looking financial adviser sitting opposite. "I would like to see the Mujahideen coming into London and killing thousands, whether with nuclear weapons or germ warfare. And if they need a safehouse, they can stay in mine - and if they need some fertiliser
, I'll tell them where to get it."
"I made a decision that I wanted to follow what Islam really said," Sayful begins, sitting on his sofa in his thowb (a traditional robe) and bare feet. "I went to listen to all the local imams, but I found their portrayal of Islam was too secularised. When I heard Sheikh Omar of al-Muhajiroun speak, it was pure Islam, with no compromise. I found that appealing."
I found this quote particularly interesting. It reminded me of something I heard from our own dear leader:
"When I watched those planes go into the Twin Towers, I felt elated," he says. "That magnificent action split the world into two camps: you were either with Islam and al Qaeda, or with the enemy."
You are either with Islam and al Qaeda, or with the enemy. Where have we heard that type of rhetoric before?