Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Earth's population to reach 9.3 billion people by 2050

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
skooooo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-09-05 09:49 PM
Original message
Earth's population to reach 9.3 billion people by 2050
http://newsfromrussia.com/world/2005/07/09/60561.html

17:48 2005-07-09
The Earth's population will grow from 6.5 billion to 9.3 billion people by 2050. The message from the German Foundation for World Population (DWS), which was published in Austria Saturday, said that the population of planet Earth was increasing by the average of 80 million people every year, which corresponds to the entire population of Germany, for example.

DWS experts said that the 95-percent increase of the global population would be presumably registered in developing countries, RIA Novosti reports. The population of the African continent will raise by one billion people before 2050. The population in Asia will grow by 1.4 billion in Asia and by 246 million people in Latin America. As for industrially developed states, the population will be decreasing there, specialists said.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Mari333 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-09-05 09:54 PM
Response to Original message
1. in 2050 I will be dead as a doornail so Im doing my part
Edited on Sat Jul-09-05 09:55 PM by Mari333
by dying , that is.
on edit: I damn well better get social security before I croak
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mike_c Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-09-05 09:57 PM
Response to Reply #1
4. hi Mari333....
Edited on Sat Jul-09-05 09:57 PM by mike_c
OT, but I this is the first post I've seen from you in some time. How are you? Did you ever get down to Mexico? :hi:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mari333 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-09-05 09:59 PM
Response to Reply #4
6. No, Im still in Michigan
my husbands death threw me for the last year..been trying to pick up the pieces for the last 11 months..slowly coming back to life now.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mike_c Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-09-05 10:03 PM
Response to Reply #6
8. well, it's good to see you on DU again!
xoxo
Mike C.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mari333 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-09-05 10:04 PM
Response to Reply #8
9. Thanks..takes a long time to recover
thanks.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
GoddessOfGuinness Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-09-05 09:54 PM
Response to Original message
2. "As for industrially developed states..."
"the population will be decreasing there, specialists said."

Until the Latin Americans and Asians immigrate to the industrially developed states, that is.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cire4 Donating Member (580 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-10-05 05:35 AM
Response to Reply #2
14. Would the Asians and Latin Americans have to immigrate?
Edited on Sun Jul-10-05 05:36 AM by cire4
It is likely that places like China, India, and Brazil will be fully industrialized, developed, and prosperous by 2050. The people of these countries will find it less and less necessary to immigrate to a 'Western' country for a job.

Perhaps, it will be people from currently developed countries (US, Europe, Australia etc) who will be immigrating to these new prosperous economies of the 21st century...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
getmeouttahere Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-09-05 09:55 PM
Response to Original message
3. And 9 billion, 200 million of them will still hate BushCo!
We are the majority, people!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
James T. Kirk Donating Member (916 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-09-05 09:57 PM
Response to Original message
5. Way to go, humanity!
We're thriving!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rayofreason Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-09-05 10:00 PM
Response to Original message
7. Lots more people...
...will need lots more energy.

Fire up those nuclear reactors unless you want global warming with an attitude.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
whistle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-09-05 10:04 PM
Response to Original message
10. Just imagine the armies that could be mobilized with those....
...kinds of numbers, eh!:sarcasm: Any idea how much of a drain on natural resources a 50% increase in world population will be in just under 45 years from now? I recall what the world was like 45 years ago, that was 1960 when there were roughly 3.2 billion people. It was right at the trough of the post war baby boom and the beginning of a new baby boom. In the 45 years which followed, world population even with the efforts of population controls has still managed to double in that period. It appears that governments and societies are actually relaxing population controls and I am not optimistic about seeing just a 2.8 billion increase in population over the next 45 years.

These will be numbers that result from neglect of mass health care and world famine, in other words the result of mass population die-offs. The conditions and pressures that will be created by that sort of social collapse will be catastrophic. With world leaders like we have in power now, we may be heading over that population cliff a lot quicker than we think.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Minstrel Boy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-09-05 10:09 PM
Response to Original message
11. Not bloody likely.
Two billion, and dropping, is my guess.

Energy wars, water wars, catastrophic climate change - it won't be pretty.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Igel Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-09-05 10:15 PM
Response to Original message
12. It's a bit higher than the UNFPA's
http://www.unfpa.org/swp/2004/english/ch1/page7.htm#1

8.9 billion's the more usual estimate (with 9.3+ being possible, but on the high side). Fertility rates keep dropping slightly faster than expected.

If they continue to go the way they're expected to go, 2060 or so is peak population, with fairly rapid depopulation to manageable numbers within a couple of generations.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
muriel_volestrangler Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-10-05 04:58 AM
Response to Original message
13. Talking of condom use in the developing world
There are some novel uses by enterprising Indians:

“People get through 600,000 condoms a day in this city alone,” Mahfooz Alam of the Weavers Movement told reporters in Varanasi (Uttar Pradesh), “but only about a quarter of them are actually used for sex. Ever since the government started giving them away free through the family planning department, people have been stocking up with as many as they can get, and finding all sorts of industrial uses for them. Some workmen mix them with tar and concrete to give a smooth finish to roads, or to make waterproof ceilings, and some villagers use them to carry water when working in the fields. And, of course, youths turn them into water bombs. But the main use here is in the sari industry, where they’ve become an essential part of the production process.”

Alam was explaining how Varanasi (population 1.3 million) manages to consume so many condoms each day. “There are 200,000 hand looms in this city, all making the world-famous Banarasi saris, and all using condoms. It’s the lubricant that’s the main attraction. Sari weavers place the condoms on the spools, and the lubricant rubs off on the thread, making it move faster through their machines. Then they turn the condoms inside out, place them on their fingers, and use the lubricant to polish the gold and silver threads used in traditional women’s outfits, giving them a lustrous sheen. Lately, government officials have got wise to the scam, and are restricting the number of free condoms they’ll hand out, so weavers have to register several times with fake identities to get a sufficient supply. If another better lubricant was available, then we’d consider using it, but nothing works as well as condoms.”

http://www.private-eye.co.uk/content/showitem.cfm/issue.1136/section.fow
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SmileyBoy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-10-05 06:53 AM
Response to Original message
15. Ugh. I'll be 62 by then.
I hope that I'll be able to live to a ripe old age without something catastrophic happening.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Dec 27th 2024, 08:05 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC