Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Novak Wrote the Story

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
erpowers Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-10-05 07:10 AM
Original message
Novak Wrote the Story
Has anyone figured out why Novak is not being threatened with jail time since he is the one who actually wrote the story that outed Plame? Has anyone in the media questioned Fitzgerald on this issue? In addition, since their is an investigation into who was the source of the outing why has Novak not been indicted for outing Plame? Futhermore, has Novak even gone before the grand jury to be questioned about the issue?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
laura888 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-10-05 07:13 AM
Response to Original message
1. good questions! anyone? n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
The Backlash Cometh Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-10-05 07:16 AM
Response to Reply #1
2. Yep.
It is now openly conjecture (a.k.a it's been reported in a MSM article) that he probably provided the testimony requested with the understanding that he would not talk to anyone about what questions were asked, nor what his answers were.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
H2O Man Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-10-05 07:37 AM
Response to Reply #2
5. It's true he talked to
the grand jury, which would keep him from being charged with contempt. However, that is distinct with the question in the OP. Why wasn't he charged with a crime? Simply because he didn't commit a crime. Why all those with common sense and patriotism recognize Novak is a slime, and his article was ugly indeed. Yet it was not illegal, and to be charged with a crime, one must break the law.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
The Backlash Cometh Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-10-05 07:54 AM
Response to Reply #5
9. Who knows? Maybe Fitz plans to round them up all at one time.
You know, as in "round up the usual suspects."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NVMojo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-10-05 07:30 AM
Response to Original message
3. he is one expensive whore if he walks away from this with nothing
but notoriety.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
formercia Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-10-05 07:33 AM
Response to Original message
4. If he were a target of the Grand Jury
he probably wouldn't be called to testify.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DoYouEverWonder Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-10-05 09:13 AM
Response to Reply #4
11. You got it
Even if he did provide testimony, he still might be under investigation. He either made a deal or pleaded the 5th is my guess.

Fitzgerald has run a virtually leak proof investigation. He's not a Ken Starr grandstanding in front of the cameras. When he does come forward with indictments and he will, it will be major. That's part of the reason for ramping up the terrorist fear again, the WH knows what's coming.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pinkpops Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-10-05 07:37 AM
Response to Original message
6. And the press ciricles the wagons, like this political toon:


The gist is that the press is there to keep us safe from the govt, right? WELL do your job, guys. Judith Miller was/is a water carrier. Novak does the same. Won't some one (in the press) tell us what's going on? SOMEONE in the press has to know.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Garbo 2004 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-10-05 07:38 AM
Response to Original message
7. Writing the story is not a crime and it's been assumed that Novak
has already cooperated with the prosecutor/grand jury which is why his ass isn't in jail. (The scuttlebutt among the press is that Novak already testified.)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KharmaTrain Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-10-05 07:45 AM
Response to Reply #7
8. Rush To Judgement Here
If Novak told the GJ that he was given that information by either Miller or Cooper from Rove...then Novak didn't pass along the "leak" per se...and what he printed, while it started this shitstorm, isn't what the focus of Fitzgerald's investigation is...it's finding out who leaked Plame's name...to Novak or anyone.

Novak's "cooperated" with the GJ so far and that's why he isn't in the slammer. He's lawyered up to the hilt...not even leaking (and Novak is one of the beltway's worst leakers) his story to another columnist. He's sitting on a bunch of things for Fitzgerald and my bets are the Douchebag of Liberty is covering his ass and has Fitzgerald believing (at this point) that he's cooperating.

Several have noted that this game may not be about Plame anymore, but the steps Rove and others have done to stall Fitzgerald's investigation...perjury, conspiracy and all those goodies. It won't be the outting of Plame that will send anyone to jail here...it's the covering up of who leaked (that's why Miller's in jail) and the efforts made to keep from getting to the truth.

It's always the cover-up... Stay tuned.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
elfin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-10-05 09:07 AM
Response to Original message
10. I do not think it is a crime for a reporter
to divulge the info -- only if a government employee does it. Now if someone can prove he is on the government payroll and thus an employee.......

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Dec 27th 2024, 07:35 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC