This is from James Wolcott's blog. Right-wingers are freaking about Stone
doing a film about 9/11. No doubt they will have to go into overdrive
denying whatever truths make it into Stone's film, and they are not looking
forward to that.
http://www.jameswolcott.com From Wolcott:
But of course the steam release over Stone's tackling 9/11 isn't about visual
talent, storytelling ability, crosscutting, or any aesthetic considerations, it's
about his lefty politics, conspiracy theorizing, friendship with Fidel Castro, all
that. Letting him do a major motion picture about 9/11 profanes the memory
of those who died there and licenses him to convert the consecrated ruins
at Ground Zero into an open-air cathedral to preach a pothead gospel of
paranoia and anti-Americanism. How dare Hollywood once again betray
everything Michael Medved holds dear!
Whenever a non-controversy galvanizes the bleary eyeballs of America's
sentinels of freedom at their computer screens, depend upon Glenn Reynolds
and Mickey Kaus to clarify the vital issues involved into clear mud.
"Keep Oliver Stone Away from 9/11! Is Oliver Stone really the person to
direct a big-budget film about the rescue of Officers McLoughlin and Jimeno
from the rubble of the World Trade Center? Stone has shown he has trouble
leaving history alone (most famously in JFK); he'll probably have some
wacky, conspiratorial left-wing theory to add into the script. ... The
McLoughlin rescue is a surprising, moving, and patriotic story if you just tell
it as it happened. Do you trust Stone to do that? I don't. ... Is Hollywood so
out of touch it thinks Stone's version of 9/11 is what America is clamoring
for? After Alexander, at that? ... Stone should be free to say what he
wants. But it might be useful for Paramount's Brad Grey to hear that many
Americans--including, say, a mob of salivating bloggers--are not eager to
provide Stone with a paying audience. ..."
Well, it's so nice and generous of Mickey to say that Stone "should be free
to say what he wants." Though "should" sounds a little conditional, a permit
that could be revoked. (Why not simply "Stone is free to say what he
wants"?)