Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Rove's Defense: I NEVER SAID HER NAME

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
ruggerson Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-10-05 12:55 PM
Original message
Rove's Defense: I NEVER SAID HER NAME
Edited on Sun Jul-10-05 01:00 PM by ruggerson
So, in other words, this is the Bush presidency's version of "what the definition of 'is' is."

If Rove told Cooper, as is now apparently verified by documentary evidence, that Joe Wilson's "wife" was a CIA agent, is that not the same thing as identifying her by name? One phone call and Cooper would have her name. The crime is the identifying and outing of a CIA agent.

And if you think that Rove did not know that she was a covert operative, I have a bridge to sell you in Brooklyn.

And if you think that Bush has not been actively involved in helping Rove cover up his crime, if not participating and authorizing the original outing itself, I have a bridge to sell you in Baghdad.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
jsamuel Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-10-05 12:56 PM
Response to Original message
1. Its the "name", stupid! (not the "knowingly")
I have been saying that since the first denial came out
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TheGoodCitizen Donating Member (300 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-10-05 01:33 PM
Response to Reply #1
14. That's Okay....
....we'll just say it for him.



What Would Rove Do? <<< (KEEP THIS IN MIND AT ALL TIMES)

www.freewayblogger.com

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
blm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-10-05 12:56 PM
Response to Original message
2. Agree one thousand percent.
.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ruggerson Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-10-05 01:01 PM
Response to Original message
3. I hope the NY Times has this on Page 1 tomorrow AM
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JohnnyRingo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-10-05 01:02 PM
Response to Original message
4. "Tell it to the judge"
He can try that defence, but it will sound more childish in a courtroom full of dour judges and prosecutors.

He's gonna have to do better than that. ...Indeed, I expect better from this weasly bunch.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HereSince1628 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-10-05 01:02 PM
Response to Original message
5. The "documentary evidence" also seems to lack words such as
covert and agent.

We should have no doubt that Rove was careful in what he said.

Who is the second administration official referred to Novak?
And who told Rove anything?











Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ruggerson Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-10-05 01:11 PM
Response to Reply #5
9. The problem is Novak will lie his ass off to save Rove
and whatever went down between them will stay between them, unless of course, it was taped.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kentuck Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-10-05 01:04 PM
Response to Original message
6. Yes, he just said "his wife" rather than saying her name?
Big difference, no?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BattyDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-10-05 01:05 PM
Response to Original message
7. He never said her name ... so what?
The name is irrelevant. If he leaked the fact that Joe Wilson's wife was a CIA agent, THAT is the crime! Any decent reporter could have easily found out her name.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
K-W Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-10-05 01:07 PM
Response to Original message
8. If he wants to get laughed out of court by the judge.
You dont have to identify someone by name to identify them.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rock Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-10-05 01:12 PM
Response to Original message
10. Gosh, I hope they don't ask if
I just spelled it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
uppityperson Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-10-05 01:14 PM
Response to Original message
11. He pointed to her, showed a pict, said "that woman"...
but never said her name. That convinces me of his innocence.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Armstead Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-10-05 01:16 PM
Response to Original message
12. Where did you see that?
I've been staying away from the media loop becauase it's nothing but hurricanes and terror the last few days.

Has Rove admitted to this?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ET Awful Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-10-05 01:16 PM
Response to Original message
13. He'll just hang himself if he tries that defense
If he says "Wilson's wife" he's as good as said her name since marriage records are public. After hearing that, any competent reporter would just check public records for a name.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Vinca Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-10-05 01:34 PM
Response to Original message
15. What a lame defense.
Are we supposed to believe Wilson has multiple wives or something? Something tells me Karl's been contemplating life behind bars.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Zen Democrat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-10-05 01:41 PM
Response to Original message
16. Exactly. Especially since she did go by the name Wilson, not Plame.
Edited on Sun Jul-10-05 01:42 PM by Zen Democrat
I read recently where she specifically said that she's been using the Wilson name since she married Wilson.

It's probable that the "Plame name" was used strictly for covert operations in the Middle East when she was posing as an analyst for the CIA front company. Therefore, Novak identifying Mrs. Wilson as "Valerie Plame" was the crux of the unmasking -- and the danger in the disclosure.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ruggerson Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-10-05 06:18 PM
Response to Reply #16
17. Yep, and Rove must actually be hoping that the masses will buy it
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AngryWhiteLiberal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-10-05 06:27 PM
Response to Original message
18. "Identity" can be DEFINED by means other than one's name.
The statute states that it is a crime to "reveal the identity" of agents and IS NOT limited to not naming the person. I'm no lawyer, but I think this scumbag defense of not saying her name is VERY SHAKEY. The key will be in how the judge interprets the statute and what instructions he gives to the grand jury as to the definition of "identity" and the revealing of said "identity."

JB
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Terran Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-10-05 06:31 PM
Response to Original message
19. Link please?
I havn't seen this story today; please provide a link. Or are you making this up to amuse us?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Zorbuddha Donating Member (822 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-10-05 06:35 PM
Response to Original message
20. This is a classic difference without a distinction.
Edited on Sun Jul-10-05 06:37 PM by Zorbuddha
He identified her.

This is a typical example of Bushco truth-telling/law-abiding by technicality. Lies are lies, dude.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SoCalDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-10-05 06:45 PM
Response to Original message
21. The people who turned in the Frank family probably told the SS
"There are Jews hidden at ....(address here...)".. They probably gave no names either :(
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rumpel Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-10-05 06:47 PM
Response to Original message
22. Maybe nor to Cooper but to Novak
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Dec 27th 2024, 08:04 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC