Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Valerie Plame should NOT make TV appearances in the wake of Rove's

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
gardenista Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-10-05 09:22 PM
Original message
Valerie Plame should NOT make TV appearances in the wake of Rove's
exposure as one of the traitors who leaked her covert identity. She should respond to any requests for TV interviews with a statement something like this:

"The damage done by the revelation of my covert identity has already led to a loss of life and destruction of important intelligence-gathering operations so crucial in a time of war. I will not risk adding to that damage by allowing my image to be used on television."

This will fend off the inevitable saturation of her image, which will result in a Rovian attempt to claim that she doesn't protect her identity, why should anyone else?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
lancdem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-10-05 09:25 PM
Response to Original message
1. I agree
I suspect she's getting advice to do just that.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WhoWantsToBeOccupied Donating Member (413 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-10-05 09:33 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. Ditto
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mythsaje Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-10-05 09:36 PM
Response to Original message
3. She's a spook
being a spook probably means she's VERY good at covering her ass. And she's going to be doubly certain to protect herself when she can't depend on the government anymore.

And Judith Miller is afraid .

If I were Plame, I might want to keep as low a profile as possible. Her testimony in front of a Grand Jury could be very interesting. She probably doesn't want to draw too much attention to that fact.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Disturbed Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-10-05 09:40 PM
Response to Reply #3
5. V. Plame may still work for the CIA but is
most obviously no longer covert or working on covert projects. Thanks to the Fascist Regime, that operation was destroyed.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mythsaje Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-10-05 09:50 PM
Response to Reply #5
7. Yeah
and I'm wondering what sort of stuff the administration may not want to come to light.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mitchtv Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-10-05 09:38 PM
Response to Original message
4. She hasn't been out there yet
Is there any indication otherwise?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
gardenista Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-10-05 09:50 PM
Response to Reply #4
6. No, not yet, but she should also get a statement out there. Because there
are photos of her around, the one from the Vanity Fair article, in scarf and glasses, but also another where her face is unobscured...

The media will follow WH talking points and inundate with her image, if they can. If she makes a statement such as the one in the OP, I think she innoculates againsts this.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
applegrove Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-10-05 09:58 PM
Response to Original message
8. Absolutely - who knows what her image will remind the people
she was around of. Who knows who it could put in danger.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Dec 27th 2024, 08:16 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC