.... its wrath.
We delivered such incendiary messages in Vietnam, Iraq, Serbia, and Afghanistan. Osama bin Laden has learned to speak the language of modern industrial warfare." And Hedges notes: "It was Robert McNamara, the American Secretary of Defense in the summer of 1965, who defined the bombing raids that would eventually leave hundreds of thousands of civilians north of Saigon dead as a means of communication to the Communist regime in Hanoi."
Forty years later, with a "war on terrorism" serving as the central theme of pro-war propaganda, the United States and its military allies are routinely sending lethal messages. It should not surprise us when such messages are returned to sender. <clip>
The president who lied his way into an invasion of Iraq is now exploiting Thursday’s atrocities in London to justify US policies that are bringing daily atrocities to Iraq. Bush is intent on sending a message to "the terrorists" by continuing the Pentagon’s war effort.
The idea of communicating by killing is very familiar. From
Terrorism, "The War on Terror" and the Message of Carnage
by Norman Solomon July 9, 2005
More at the link:
http://www.truthout.org/docs_2005/070905X.shtml We need to develop a different message and we have a powerful communications medium in which to spread and implement that message. Let's make history that is not a redundant, banal rehash of the cycle of mass murder justifying more mass murder.
Senator Boxer addressed the issue of the history we could make, quite eloquently, this past week."Iraq: Credibility, Responsibility, Accountability"
by Senator Barbara BoxerJuly 6, 2005 Address to the Commonwealth Club
<clip>
Last week, President Bush had a chance to regain credibility when it comes to Iraq. In my opinion, he did not. He mentioned 9/11 five times in 30 minutes,
despite the fact that there is absolutely no connection between Iraq and that tragic day. Iraq was a war of choice, not necessity. The war of necessity was the war against Osama bin Laden that we launched after 9/11...the war that every single Senator voted for...the war that was a clear response to the vicious attack of that day.
<clip>
Now, there were some who tried to speak the truth. But they didn't last long in the Bush Administration. Richard Clarke and Paul O'Neill are both gone. Army Vice Chief of Staff General Eric Shinseki estimated that it could take "several hundred thousand" soldiers to successfully stabilize Iraq, Wolfowitz called that number "wildly off the mark." Shinseki retired early. White House economic adviser Lawrence Lindsey said that a U.S. intervention in Iraq could cost between $100 and $200 billion. He was disputed, and ultimately left. We've now surpassed $200 billion.
The rest of us were told we had no right to criticize the President in a time of war.<clip>
Because, 20, 50, even 100 years from now, another group will gather in this spot to discuss issues of war and peace. And, when they do, I hope they look back and say that the summer of 2005 is when Americans, brought credibility, accountability, and responsibility to a very tough situation.Full transcript at:
http://www.truthout.org/docs_2005/071005A.shtml Listen to the speech at:
http://www.commonwealthclub.org/audio/05-07boxer-complete.ram Yes, in the Summer of 2005, we Americans need to make a decision.
Do we simply want to extend the wealth of the military corporatist and the neoconster mechanism that ensures that wealth, perpetual war: Perpetual killing and perpetual destruction with ever more sophisticated weapons.
Because if that is the only message we have for the vast segment of the earth's population that is not wealthy, then they will continue to respond in a manner that ensures the cycle of fear, the cycle of hatred and the cycle of killing never cease.In the history of mankind we have never had a more facile and peaceful mechanism for communicating our goals, our challenges, our differences and our willingness to solve rather than slaughter. You are using that technology when you read this post.
We have the mechanism to rally vast numbers of citizens, throughout the world, to refuse to participate and refuse to fund the corporate enterprises of killing and destruction, of fear-mongering and torture, of private armies and phony security services.
We should urge that people throughout the world march in their capitols and other major cities on September 24 - 26, 2005 in synchrony of purpose of what will be happening in DC:
D.C. - United for Peace and Justice - 9/24-26/2005
http://impeachbush.meetup.com/boards/view/viewthread?thread=1429154We need to realize that the solution is much, much more than 'Impeach Bu$h'; we must unite as the citizens of the world
in refusing to participate in wealth-creation by cluster-bombing children and innocent civilians in response to 'terror': terror that was the induced outcome of a previous cycle of aggressive war launched as the profit-generating, and 'patriot'-rallying response to a previous 'terrorist' event.
Break the cycle of terror by breaking the cycle of profiteering on smart bombs.
Break the cycle of terror with a response other than 'shock and awe.'
Break the cycle of terror by refusing to be a high-tech terrorist.Begin a chapter of history that has never before been written; a chapter about global peacemaking.
A chapter about communicating with compassion, with food, with medicine, with clean water; a chapter the terrorist will understand all too well as the elegy of their ilk; the foreclousre notice to their enterprises-of-death.
Peace.
www.missionnotaccomplished.us - How ever long it takes, the day must come when tens of millions of caring individuals peacefully but persistently defy the dictator, deny the corporatists their cash flow, and halt the evil being done in Iraq and in all the other places the Bu$h neoconster regime is destroying civilization and the environment in the name of "America."