Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Freepermania: Working Women (again)

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
janx Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-11-05 01:12 AM
Original message
Freepermania: Working Women (again)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Triana Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-11-05 01:14 AM
Response to Original message
1. Of course. Duh. They have the financial independence not to..
Edited on Mon Jul-11-05 01:15 AM by Triana
...have to stay married and miserable (if they're miserably married). That's one big point of women having jobs and some financial independence. I don't see the problem with that. That's one big reason a lot of men don't want their wives working though.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SoCalDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-11-05 01:15 AM
Response to Original message
2. Women are more likely to divorce men
..All women "work"...and perhaps the ones with OUTSIDE-the home employent end up divorcing because they still have all the other duties too..or because once they are gainfully employed, they no longer "need" to be married..

Methinks the guys should do a little soul searching:)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
janx Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-11-05 01:18 AM
Response to Reply #2
3. And women too.
It would certainly make better marriages. But maybe I'm just an idealistic "liberal."

;-)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
uppityperson Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-11-05 01:19 AM
Response to Reply #2
5. I don't work. I just sit around all day eating bonbons and reading DU
while my servants massage my feet. I will never get divorced. snort.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
janx Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-11-05 01:26 AM
Response to Reply #5
8. Same here. My kids
sailed through life without my financial or domestic support. :rofl:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
uppityperson Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-11-05 01:29 AM
Response to Reply #8
10. The main problem is deciding which scented oil to use on my ft.
Good thing welfare pays so well. :rofl:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
janx Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-11-05 01:30 AM
Response to Reply #10
11. Don't forget the food stamp coupons, because all of us,
especially single moms, are supposed to use them. ;-)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
uppityperson Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-11-05 01:32 AM
Response to Reply #11
14. Puts a crimp into being married. I know, how about commonlaw
that way I could get foodstamps AND be married. Wait, I'd have to get divorced first, then commonlaw married. I'd be divorced. Even if I was married again. and that would be a sin.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
janx Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-11-05 01:36 AM
Response to Reply #14
15. This is confusing as hell.
Just to get food stamps?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
uppityperson Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-11-05 01:44 AM
Response to Reply #15
17. Too difficult for me to figure out too. Just being silly.
Back to working women get divorced, so women shouldn't work. So a man would never divorce a woman who isn't working? aha. Tell them that that's what every woman should do that is worried about her husband getting a divorce, quit working.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
janx Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-11-05 01:47 AM
Response to Reply #17
18. Somehow
I don't think that would fly... :rofl:

We have our mothers and older sisters to thank for that.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FreedomAngel82 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-11-05 01:18 AM
Response to Original message
4. Oh brother
Just another way to get us to stay home. :eyes:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NMMNG Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-11-05 01:25 AM
Response to Original message
6. Maybe because they have the capability?
Women who are able to support themselves (and any children they might have) are more likely to do so, rather than remaining in an unhappy or abusive marriage just for the sake of financial support.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
janx Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-11-05 01:31 AM
Response to Reply #6
12. YES. That's obvious.
:rofl:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FormerRepublican Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-11-05 01:25 AM
Response to Original message
7. Working women more likely to divorce
...Especially if they're married to freepers. Didn't read the fine print, did ya? ;)

LOL!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
janx Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-11-05 01:28 AM
Response to Reply #7
9. That might make one
tempted to use birth control and put on shoes! :rofl:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mcctatas Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-11-05 01:32 AM
Response to Reply #7
13. LOL
probably because they are sick of working their fingers to the bone while their evil freeper hubbies sit on the "internets" flogging the bishop to porn and pondering the coming rapture!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
janx Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-11-05 01:40 AM
Response to Reply #13
16. Or flipping through misogynist porn the old fashioned way...
the magazines, the magazines and videos! :rofl:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FormerRepublican Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-11-05 02:05 AM
Response to Reply #16
22. Now, now...
"the magazines, the magazines and videos!"

If the freeper didn't have instructional materials, they would never figure it out! And don't forget the difficulty in exchanging paper toys with real, LIVE women! We mustn't look down on the poor and unfortunate of this world (even to advance freeper population control).

And it does give added insight into all those divorces ...!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
janx Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-11-05 02:37 AM
Response to Reply #22
25. That type of behavior transcends political parties,
but I recognize your knowledge of it. It's pretty bad.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kipepeo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-11-05 01:51 AM
Response to Original message
19. One of the freepers said
Edited on Mon Jul-11-05 01:58 AM by Kipepeo
"A recent study showed that women do about an hour more housework than men, and that men spend about an hour more on the job than do women. Sounds like a wash to me. Fair and balanced."

I'd like to see them cite a statistic for that. All of the studies I've seen show that women do a lot more than 1 extra hour of housework a week upon cohabitating with a man - and that men do far fewer. The freeper won't cite a statistic or source but I will: http://www.geocities.com/Wellesley/1889/menhousework.html

A researcher at the University of Michigan's Population Studies Center found that after couples marry or move in together, women do about four additional hours a week of housework, while men do three hours less.


edit, Here's another: http://asweb.artsci.uc.edu/sociology/kunzctr/stats.htm

On average, women ages 18-65 spend about 30 hours per week in paid employment and 22 hours doing housework (see also Arlie Hochschild's, The Second Shift, 1989). Men average about ten hours per week doing housework, a figure which changes little when their wives work and they have young children in the household.


edited once more to add my opinion on the working woman divorce statistic: If you're not working outside the home and your partner won't lift a finger to help you with domestic work I can see not being bothered - it's a give and take and you each contribute in your own ways to the household. But if you're both putting in similar work hours outside of the home and your partner won't put in a fair share of domestic work I'd think you'd start to get tired of it. Women have moved into the working world but there hasn't been a similar shift in the domestic.


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pnorman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-11-05 01:52 AM
Response to Original message
20. "Leader or Loafer"
Edited on Mon Jul-11-05 01:58 AM by pnorman
From that same webpage:

:rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl:

pnorman
On edit: NOTHING to add, other than those smilies describe me to a Tee. That photo pair is a Freeper classic --- a "KEEPER".
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
janx Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-11-05 01:54 AM
Response to Reply #20
21. Look at their wives...
:rofl:

Debutante or scholar?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
deadparrot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-11-05 02:09 AM
Response to Original message
23. Wouldn't you rather a person be divorced
than to live in misery and to raise children in such an environment?

And if the *reason* for the divorce is simply because the woman is working, then it doesn't sound like a very healthy relationship to begin with. Not to mention that the freeps should keep in mind that not every household can survive on a single salary. :eyes:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DanCa Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-11-05 02:16 AM
Response to Reply #23
24. That would make too much sense
Edited on Mon Jul-11-05 02:18 AM by DanCa
But I agree with what your saying. You know I know alot of good people and for some reason or another the marriage just doesn't work. It's none of our buisness really too decide what two people should do really.And than theres are the really abusive cases which I would rather not think about that.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mr blur Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-11-05 02:38 AM
Response to Original message
26. Check out this moron:
"Working women often don't care as much about their children as do women who sacrifice to stay home and raise their children"

Doesn't seem to grasp that havingto go out to work and not be with your kids is a sacrifice.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kipepeo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-11-05 02:56 AM
Response to Reply #26
27. Well, to FR's benefit there are at least some hard-workin women
who won't stand for that sexist shit. Conservative Cat said:

"Oh yeah- I don't give a darn about my kids because I work.
I am up at 3:30 every morning, dragging my happy rear to work, so I can be home by the time the older two are home from school. I work so my kids can have a roof over their head and food on the table. I guess that's not caring about my kids. I know many woman who would rather go on public assistance than get a job, when the family clearly needs it. A friend of mine lost his job years ago and while he was out of work (for 2-3 years), they lost their house, savings, EVERYTHING, and his wife never even considered a part-time job to help keep the finances together. I care about my kids enough to provide for them."

I want to take Conservative Cat out for a girls night drink and tell her she is barking up the wrong political message board. :(
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lecky Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-11-05 03:01 AM
Response to Reply #27
28. That's what I don't understand
I know there are women who post at free republic, why do they stand for this type of crap? Do they pretend like it doesn't exist or (even more frightening) agree with these pigs?

Are they so scared of appearing "liberal", that they can't even stick up for themselves?

...pathetic
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
girl gone mad Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-11-05 03:28 AM
Response to Reply #27
30.  These women don't belong on freerepublic.
However did they get brianwashed into thinking they they fit into the modern day Republican party?

Look at this one:

... Women, my friend, are not a commodity. We are human beings with needs, likes, dislikes, etc. just like you men! It just enrages me when people blame divorce rates on women working. Whose idea was it for us to have to go out to work anyway? Don't punish us just because we turned out to be good at it. Isn't that what this boils down to anyway?"\

Does she not know what her party has been preaching for the past 20+ years?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kipepeo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-11-05 03:35 AM
Response to Reply #30
32. True
The freeper men's posts on this subject are a dime a dozen - nothing surprising or shocking there. But the women - goodness, the women - they're fascinating. What keeps part of their mind locked down when the part that experiences sexism is aware and able to articulate it? What keeps them there?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
girl gone mad Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-11-05 03:03 AM
Response to Reply #26
29. or this one:
" And if women stayed home the value of their husband's (and of other men's)labor could double!"

Just what kind of a fantasy world are these nutjobs living in?

Can you imagine what would happen if women stopped being doctors, nurses, lawyers, scientists, teachers, etc. to stay home and take care of their husbands?

First of all, The cost of these services would skyrocket. Unless the husband was working in a job that benefitted from the sudden reduction in labor, the couple wouldn't be able to afford to go to the doctor and property taxes would soar. Certain jobs could be outsourced, but we would also need to bring in significant numbers of immigrants, something conservatives are opposed to.

The majority of people would be screwed if conservative Christians got their wish.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kipepeo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-11-05 03:30 AM
Response to Reply #29
31. Not to mention that a whole lotta low-paying domestic-sphere
jobs wouldn't be filled by men. I'd like to see the male freepers volunteer to fill all the empty hotel-maid jobs or the countless paid-less-than-shit waitress jobs or the, god forbid, housekeeper/nanny/babysitting jobs. Step up and fill these low-paying jobs that people look down on but expect there is always a woman (mostly of-color and frequently undocumented) to do it - please freeper men, show us how you'd "double" your "labor!" - and willingly? Good god I'd hafta see this to believe it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Dec 27th 2024, 08:19 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC