Where terror and the bomb could meet
by Amir MirJuly 7 2005
In May 1999, a Saudi Arabian defense team, headed by Defense Minister Prince Sultan bin Abdul Aziz, visited Pakistan's highly restricted uranium enrichment and missile assembly factory. The prince toured the Kahuta uranium enrichment plant and an adjacent factory where the Ghauri missile is assembled with then Pakistani prime minister Nawaz Sharif,
and was briefed by Khan. A few months later,
Khan traveled to Saudi Arabia (in November 1999) ....
<clip>
Interestingly, Saudi defector Mohammed Khilevi, who was first secretary of the Saudi mission to the United Nations until July 1994, testified before the IAEA that Riyadh had sought a bomb since 1975. In late June 1994, Khilevi abandoned his UN post to join the opposition.
After his defection, Khilevi distributed more than 10,000 documents he obtained from the Saudi Arabian Embassy. These documents show that between 1985 and 1990, the Saudi government paid up to US$5 billion to Saddam Hussein to build a nuclear weapon. Khilevi further alleged that
Saudis had provided financial contributions to the Pakistani nuclear program, and had signed a secret agreement that obligated Islamabad to respond against an aggressor with its nuclear arsenal if Saudi Arabia was attacked with nuclear weapons.
<clip>
Following Khan's first admission of proliferation to Iran, Libya and North Korea in January 2004, the
Saudi authorities pulled out more than 80 ambassador-rank and senior diplomats from its missions around the world, mainly in Europe and Asia. The pullout is widely thought to have
been meant to plug any likely leak of the Pakistani-Saudi nuclear link. <clip>
Before September 11, Saudi Arabia, the United Arab Emirates and Pakistan were the only countries that recognized and aided Afghanistan's Taliban regime, which had been educated in Pakistan's religious schools (madrassas).
Despite the fall of the Taliban regime in late 2001, the Saudis continue to fund these seminaries that are a substitute for Pakistan's non-existent national education system and largely produce Wahhabi extremists and Islamist terrorists. Also, a substantial proportion of their curricula, including the sections which preach hatred, has also emerged from Saudi Arabia.
Much more at the link:
http://www.atimes.com/atimes/South_Asia/GG07Df05.html For starters, the extensive report by Pakastani reporter, Amir Mir, appeared on July 6 2005 and, to date, the only recognition in the American press that I can find is a brief blog in the Huffington Post by Harry Shearer.
I am not surprised; I'm sure most folk reading this are not surprised either. We know how to find information and, more importantly, we are all aware that it is our responsibility to spread it because the corporate media in America is defunct, derelict, duplicitous and worse.
To return to Amir Mir's report, it is worthy of a full read as I hope the few segments I've excerpted convey.
Ample evidence exists that Saudi Arabia has had extensive interactions with the Pakastani nuclear establishment and ample evidence exists that Saudi riyals support indoctrination of students to hate and to act accordingly.
From the perspective of a neocon corporatist the market opportunity couldn't be better. Purchase vasts amounts of oil to fuel the ultra-expensive war craft. Oil merchants finance the training of low-tech, highly dispersed, highly motivated - to the point of being suicidal - killers. Create situations that provoke the actions of the killers (the list is very long). Acts of 'terror' occur. Citizens are frightened. Fear-mongering media keep them frightened and thereby enable the corporatist's servants in the government to appropriate ever larger sums for the creation of even more expensive war craft.
The neocon corporatist business plan is not sustainable. We all know that.
We know that each cycle of their perpetual war machine leads to more instability, more hatred, and more attacks. The business fails when: 1. A war cycle is so deadly as to destroy the neocon corporatist war industry and probably much of the population of the host nation; or, 2. A war cycle is sufficient to enrage the citizens to change their government and halt the neocon war industry.
I think we citizens of the world have already witnessed enough to be enraged sufficiently to make # 2 happen, before the increasingly inevitable # 1 happens.
We do not have much time. Peace.
www.missionnotaccomplished.us - How ever long it takes, the day must come when tens of millions of caring individuals peacefully but persistently defy the dictator, deny the corporatists their cash flow, and halt the evil being done in Iraq and in all the other places the Bu$h neoconster regime is destroying civilization and the environment in the name of "America."